Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If the 'Dear Boss' letter is a hoax...
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostIsn't the phrase "Personal sources from the archives" a contradiction in terms?
Either they are personal to you or they belong to these "archives", surely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pierre View PostNo, surely not David. Without persons, no personal sources. Without archives to collect personal sources, no personal sources collected in archives.
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostBut without persons there are no sources at all. So doesn't that mean that all sources are "personal sources"? So why not just say "sources from the archives"? What did the word "personal" add to distinguish your sources from any others?
Comment
-
A librarian's viewpoint...
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostBut without persons there are no sources at all. So doesn't that mean that all sources are "personal sources"? So why not just say "sources from the archives"? What did the word "personal" add to distinguish your sources from any others?
An archive could collect any of the above sources.Pat D. https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...rt/reading.gif
---------------
Von Konigswald: Jack the Ripper plays shuffleboard. -- Happy Birthday, Wanda June by Kurt Vonnegut, c.1970.
---------------
Comment
-
Originally posted by John G View PostAnd, of course, these "sources" are all undisclosed, therefore may well be completely fanciful. This is irrefutable logic.
Unbelievable!
Wonder if that's because they're non existentG U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostWell let's ask him shall we....
Pierre, when you say "personal sources" are you referring to letters, diaries or memoirs that you have found in "the archives"?
this would back what Pierre claimed that he found his great discovery while researching something else: possibly a family history or biography of a person he was researching.
Of course this does not mean anything has been interpreted correctly.
Incidentally does carrying out genealogy make one an Academic Historian?
Steve
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Postthis would back what Pierre claimed that he found his great discovery while researching something else: possibly a family history or biography of a person he was researching.
There is a first time for everything.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostDavid
We never know, didn't we recently have a Black Moon
So I guess anything is possible."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostWhat's a black moon? I've never heard that before. Is that like a new moon or eclipse?
Hi Abby
I noticed a BBC news story last week about it, and not something I have really heard of before.
Can't seem to find the BBC link but here are two more.
all the best steve
Comment
Comment