Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If the 'Dear Boss' letter is a hoax...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by John G View Post
    They seek him here, they seek him there...
    I don't seek him anywhere

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Then Pierre start discussing, I mean real discussion, not the type where you tell us you have an idea, you have tested it and it holds true, that is not debate it is a monologue.

    I am always happy to debate, and if you give details we can have a good debate, unfortunately you will not.

    I asked questions about your expert two days ago, which you have still not responded to( yes i know a different thread, but it illustrates my point)

    Yesterday when you said how difficult it was not being able to discus your ideas I offered a solution which could help you.

    steve
    Thank you Steve. You help me more than you know.

    Best wishes, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    You don't expect an answer do you?
    Well GUT, if there's one thing that everyone in this forum knows and remembers, it's that Pierre absolutely promised to reveal everything if he didn't find the conclusive piece of evidence he was looking for within 12 months.

    More than 12 months later, on the basis of my assessment of the trustworthiness of the individual, my answer is that no, I do not expect an answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    You don't expect an answer do you?
    Of course not, but it won't stop him following Pierre around like a lovesick puppy.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Let's go back to the start of this particular line of discussion in respect of the above claim.

    The question is: what sources?

    Not what type of sources. What actual sources.
    You don't expect an answer do you?

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    there are sources indicating that they sent away the killer after Kelly. But he came back in 1889.
    Let's go back to the start of this particular line of discussion in respect of the above claim.

    The question is: what sources?

    Not what type of sources. What actual sources.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Dear Steve,

    I am not "touchy". I am critical. In the social sense here, not in the scientific sense.

    I wish the case could be at the center of our discussions instead of all the terrible nonsense.

    Best wishes, Pierre
    Then Pierre start discussing, I mean real discussion, not the type where you tell us you have an idea, you have tested it and it holds true, that is not debate it is a monologue.

    I am always happy to debate, and if you give details we can have a good debate, unfortunately you will not.

    I asked questions about your expert two days ago, which you have still not responded to( yes i know a different thread, but it illustrates my point)

    Yesterday when you said how difficult it was not being able to discus your ideas I offered a solution which could help you.


    steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    David Orsam & Pierre, I wish you two would get a room already. There's no reason to clog up all these threads with your public displays of affection.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    I wish the case could be at the center of our discussions instead of all the terrible nonsense.
    We all do Pierre but you tell us nothing while pretending to know lots.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Pierre,

    You Told the forum this information.

    Its only what you posted yourself.


    Why so touchy?


    steve
    Dear Steve,

    I am not "touchy". I am critical. In the social sense here, not in the scientific sense.

    I wish the case could be at the center of our discussions instead of all the terrible nonsense.

    Best wishes, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    You do not know anything about my personal interests. Stop this.
    Pierre,

    You Told the forum this information.

    Its only what you posted yourself.


    Why so touchy?


    steve

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    You do not know anything about my personal interests. Stop this.
    Of course I do. Because you posted about your personal interests. You said:

    "Love to watch horror movies and serial-killer movies and saw the movie with Michael Cane too, among all the other movies. Cane is a brilliant actor."

    It's Michael Caine btw.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Of course you are ignored David. That is because of your constant belittling and your offensive posts directed to me and directed to others about me.
    It only seems to happen when I ask you a question which you have difficulty in answering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Perhaps I should read through your posts David and see which ones of your offensive posts and how many I would like to report to Admin.

    David just was rereading posts, I am sure you do that all the time too, he posted something he had found and i asked for the link.

    So no need for that tone of reply really is there.

    steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    You'll see, incidentally, that he loves to watch horror movies and 'serial killer movies' so I can't help thinking that he gets his ideas from Hollywood rather than Historians.
    You do not know anything about my personal interests. Stop this.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X