Schwartz should be there. Nothing wrong with him.
Schwartz had every reason to be on Berner Street at the time and place.
He would have passed that spot at the time and place going home.
Nobody has demonstrated he shouldn't have been there.
Given that he must be there and in the 21st century would be tracked down and investigated, to say Schwartz lied is akin to someone being in a bank during a robbery and then lying about what the robbers did.
There is no reason to make him dissapear. On the other hand the things that don't appear - no blood on scarf, no gravitational flow of blood down her front, render this guess about upright rear attacks simply fantasy... Which is something Schwartz never described as he described frontal blitz.
Schwartz had every reason to be on Berner Street at the time and place.
He would have passed that spot at the time and place going home.
Nobody has demonstrated he shouldn't have been there.
Given that he must be there and in the 21st century would be tracked down and investigated, to say Schwartz lied is akin to someone being in a bank during a robbery and then lying about what the robbers did.
There is no reason to make him dissapear. On the other hand the things that don't appear - no blood on scarf, no gravitational flow of blood down her front, render this guess about upright rear attacks simply fantasy... Which is something Schwartz never described as he described frontal blitz.
Comment