JtR Identity Theory Awards

[FISHY1118]

If you and a couple of others stuck to posting based on logic, reason and the evidence rather than on a combination of theory-based bias and a personal dislike of me then threads might not get derailed and closed.

Me and a couple of others can say exactly the same about you , but you fail to see that, but then again you fail to see a lot of things

Secondly.....every post that you made on the Chapman thread was thoroughly and easily rebutted as biased nonsense. TOD 5.25-5.30 beyond all reasonable doubt.......no more on Chapman though as this isn’t the topic of the thread.

False statement about Chapman again by you . Only in your mind do ''you'' rebutt it , AS IVE PROVED THAT.

Thirdly......Knight’s work has been thoroughly researched and rebutted. This is why you appear to be the only person in the world that supports the theory.

Rubbish , there are many who have researched knights work, those who have done so properly acknowledge its authenticity.

I dont particularity care what thread or topic it is , every time you slag off on knight im going to respond and call you out .... EVERYTIME

[Herlock Sholmes]

I dont particularity care what thread or topic it is , every time you slag off on knight im going to respond and call you out .... EVERYTIME

Then start another thread and show some consideration for others on this one. I won’t respond to you on here on things off-topic. You ruin every thread that you take part in with your anger-driven biased nonsense.

[DJA]

Crikey,this thread was nice and friendly until post #33.

Now it is another train wreck.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Crikey,this thread was nice and friendly until post #33.

Now it is another train wreck.

Surprise, surprise. Another pathetic attempt to blame me for everything. I simply said that the Knight/Sickert theory is baseless nonsense. Something that 99% of ripperologists would agree on.

Without wishing in anyway to criticise other posters it’s noticeable that, in obsessing on my post, you ignorethis from APerno:

. Worst Conspiracy Theory ever!

The Royal Conspiracy Theory is tough to beat; but a different version has MJK working at the Cleveland Street Men's Club and 'brothel.' (In this theory the brothel swung both ways, boys and girls) Armed with information gathered Mary Kelly foolishly tries to blackmail Eddy (PAV), threatening to expose his supposed homosexual behavior. Needless to say this theory doesn't surface until after the raid on the Men's Club in late 1889 but it has the all the right elements attached: a conspiracy of whores; sexual scandal, police cover-up, Free Mason killers, a prince who likes little boys, and a queen.

or this from Ms Diddles:

. Yeah, the Royal Conspiracy theory is pretty unbeatable.

It has been extremely influential and, for reasons which I can't quite explain, it refuses to die despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary.

or this from Etenguy:

.

There really is no evidence for the royal conspiracy. Even the original perpetrator of the theory admitted he'd made it up.

Yet you focus on my post.

Grow up and get a life Dave. You are embarrassing yourself and everyone else.

[DJA]

Thou doth protest too much!

[Herlock Sholmes]

Thou doth protest too much!

No, I just proved that your post was a pathetic and biased attempt at criticising me. You claimed that the thread had gone downhill after a post by me whilst at the same time ignoring 3 posts by other posters all expressing the same viewpoint as mine.

Dave, it has now passed the point where your vindictive obsession with me has become an embarrassment. I don’t want to keep wasting my time with you. If you have anything constructive to say about the case then please try doing it for a change. Why don’t you take Admin’s advice and put me on Ignore if my mere presence causes you to burst into tears like a little girl every time I post? I, on the other hand, will continue to discus the topics.

[DJA]

The other three were not stalking FISHY1118,unlike yourself.

You are one of four people I have on ignore.

Unfortunately that only works when I'm logged in.

[packers stem]

Sometimes instead of feeling everyone else is being unreasonable towards you, it's best to look within just in case

[etenguy]

I notice no-one has mentioned the Dear Boss letter - are we writing that one off?

[Al Bundy's Eyes]

I notice no-one has mentioned the Dear Boss letter - are we writing that one off?

I am.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Sometimes instead of feeling everyone else is being unreasonable towards you, it's best to look within just in case

It’s not everyone. It’s DJA, Fishy and The Baron. The evidence is in black and white.

[Ms Diddles]

I notice no-one has mentioned the Dear Boss letter - are we writing that one off?

The jury's out on that one for me.

I vote Lusk!

[Herlock Sholmes]

The other three were not stalking FISHY1118,unlike yourself.

You are one of four people I have on ignore.

Unfortunately that only works when I'm logged in.

Responding = stalking.

Etenguy’s Post was a direct response to Fishy by the way . Try reading.

Happy to be ignored by you. Please make it a permanent thing as I’m allergic to drivel.

[The Baron]

Stand up when you mention me


The Baron

[etenguy]

Dear Boss is not gaining many votes, so how about saucy jack?