If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Sickert would win that category with Ostrog a strong contendet!
Show me evidence that Sickert was out of the country when the murders of Nichols . Chapman , Stride , Eddowes , Kelly where committed .
'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
As we all know, the Royal Conspiracy/Knight/Sickert Theory is baseless nonsense. Enjoyable and entertaining yes, a valid theory....no. A theory can’t remain plausible when so many of its basic tenets have been so thoroughly dismissed. The fact that someone might still attach substance to it is a testament to wish-thinking.
Totally untrue as per usual from someone who refuses to allow any theory but his own . Im sure you read the last post in ''Chapman death'' thread , now you know i was right about the cutting of her throat dont you .And how ridiculous the thought that the ripper made the noise codosch claimed... onward and upward. Only people who have not researched knights work properly are lost to understand its complexity . That would be you .
'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Totally untrue as per usual from someone who refuses to allow any theory but his own . Im sure you read the last post in ''Chapman death'' thread , now you know i was right about the cutting of her throat dont you .And how ridiculous the thought that the ripper made the noise codosch claimed... onward and upward. Only people who have not researched knights work properly are lost to understand its complexity . That would be you .
Firstly.......I don’t have a theory. I stand by my posts.
Secondly.....every post that you made on the Chapman thread was thoroughly and easily rebutted as biased nonsense. TOD 5.25-5.30 beyond all reasonable doubt.......no more on Chapman though as this isn’t the topic of the thread.
Thirdly......Knight’s work has been thoroughly researched and rebutted. This is why you appear to be the only person in the world that supports the theory.
If you have new evidence that none of us are aware of which exonerates the Knight/Sickert theory please feel free provide it (not here though....you are free to begin a new thread) I’m sure that the world of Ripperology would be keen to hear your revelations. I seem to recall asking you over 10 times to back up your claim that you could prove that Simon Wood’s research was wrong but, unsurprisingly, you just ignored the request or tried to change the subject.
If you and a couple of others stuck to posting based on logic, reason and the evidence rather than on a combination of theory-based bias and a personal dislike of me then threads might not get derailed and closed.
Comment