Two witnesses, Helen Markham and Barbara Jeanette Davis, testified that the jacket worn by the murderer was noticeably darker than the one allegedly discarded by Oswald, and that the murderer wore a lighter shirt than Oswald's.
Herlock Shomes describes these obviously important details of identification evidence as irrelevant nonsense and complete irrelevance and someone who recognises their importance as obsessed with jackets.
It is obvious to anyone with the slightest degree of objectivity that the prosecution case against Oswald was seriously flawed, but not perhaps to someone who, by his own admission, would not have bothered with a trial and would have proceeded straight to the electrocution.
Herlock Shomes describes these obviously important details of identification evidence as irrelevant nonsense and complete irrelevance and someone who recognises their importance as obsessed with jackets.
It is obvious to anyone with the slightest degree of objectivity that the prosecution case against Oswald was seriously flawed, but not perhaps to someone who, by his own admission, would not have bothered with a trial and would have proceeded straight to the electrocution.
Comment