Do you think William Herbert Wallace was guilty?

[AmericanSherlock]

For the four thousand six hundred and eleventh time Rod.


DO YOU EVER INTEND TO PROPERLY ANSWER THE VERY SPECIFIC QUESTION THAT IVE ASKED!!!

The answer will be in the book

Seriously, one usually doesn't see this level of evasion apart from presidential debates

[Herlock Sholmes]

For the four thousand six hundred and eleventh time Rod.


DO YOU EVER INTEND TO PROPERLY ANSWER THE VERY SPECIFIC QUESTION THAT IVE ASKED!!!

[AmericanSherlock]

Defendant, how do you plead for drunk and disorderly, flashing yourself in public and scaring away children?

"Just buy the book, folks"

[RodCrosby]

This rubbish all you got? [rhetorical question]

And the answer comes loudly and clear, time and again.

"Yep, an endless supply, like all obsessive little trolls."

Just buy the book, folks.

It's about the real world, where among other things tram stops are in the same street where... oddly the tram actually runs on its rails buried in the ground, and not in a different street where its rails don't run.... And ash-bins were behind locked-gates after dark...

[Herlock Sholmes]

Forget being an author. Rod should become a politician. He’s an expert at avoiding answering a question properly We’ve been on this for 2 days and he still won’t answer a childishly simple question. All I’m asking is for a direct response to my question.

Not much to expect is it?

[Herlock Sholmes]

A mental hospital in 2025 near Liverpool:

A man around 65 shouts "But the book...the book....the book.... it's coming soon"

The orderlies come.

The man is injected and calms down.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Which was physically impossible, as everyone can see from the map the expert posted.

Belmont Road trams did not go to the City Centre, and City Centre trams did not go UP (or down !) Belmont Road.

Except in the trolls' fantasy alternative universe, where facts don't count.

File it in the ash-bin.... [you know, the one behind the 1000 locked gates that Wallace tried before finding one randomly unlocked after dark; the ash-bins the Sanitation Dept. routinely searched for items of non-ash; the same Sanitation Dept. the Police specifically recruited to look out for the murder-weapon; the ash-bin Wallace himself suggested...]

Yawn....

it's a good book, folks.

The only book that solves the Wallace case...

Out soon...

So why were the trams only one way? What was the tram tram dropped Wallace and Caird off the same night.

[AmericanSherlock]

A mental hospital in 2025 near Liverpool:

A man around 65 shouts "But the book...the book....the book.... it's coming soon"

The orderlies come.

The man is injected and calms down.

[RodCrosby]

"The evidence is quite consistent with some unknown criminal, for some unknown motive, having got into the house and executed the murder and gone away... If there was an unknown murderer, he has covered up his traces."
Mr. Justice Wright in Rex v Wallace

"Are you not really saying that if it be assumed that this man committed the murder, other circumstances fit in with that?"
The Lord Chief Justice, Court of Criminal Appeal 19 May 1931(1932) 23 Cr. App. R. 32

"The Court will quash a conviction founded on mere suspicion" [headnote]
Court of Criminal Appeal 19 May 1931(1932) 23 Cr. App. R. 32

And still...a couple of malignant trolls who think the same 1931 playbook which failed so abysmally will somehow work again in 2018. Go figure....

The forthcoming book "closes the book" on the Wallace Case. Fresh thinking... New Evidence... Abductive Reasoning....

In your bookshop soon!

[AmericanSherlock]

Has anyone ever heard of a book with a publisher that doesn't have a title or name of an author yet?

[RodCrosby]

UP BELMONT AND THERE CAUGHT A TRAM. (There being Belmont Road....the road that he’d just gone up.

Which was physically impossible, as everyone can see from the map the expert posted.

Belmont Road trams did not go to the City Centre, and City Centre trams did not go UP (or down !) Belmont Road.

Except in the trolls' fantasy alternative universe, where facts don't count.

File it in the ash-bin.... [you know, the one behind the 1000 locked gates that Wallace tried before finding one randomly unlocked after dark; the ash-bins the Sanitation Dept. routinely searched for items of non-ash; the same Sanitation Dept. the Police specifically recruited to look out for the murder-weapon; the ash-bin Wallace himself suggested...]

Yawn....

it's a good book, folks.

The only book that solves the Wallace case...

Out soon...

[Herlock Sholmes]

This is an incredibly difficult case that will most likely never be conclusively solved. We both favour Wallace heavily but admit of the possibility however slight that he could have been innocent.

Anyone who says that they are 100% confident that the case is solved is utterly dillusional.

Anyone who says that a scenario that ‘might’ have fitted the facts means case solved is plain childish.

Anyone who thinks they’ve solved this case and that they’ve proved 100% that Shakespeare didn’t write his plays has a serious case of an over-inflated ego.

Anyone who simply cannot cope with being disagreed with has a pathological self-esteem problem.

Anyone who thinks that just because they think that something is true then it must be is borderline insane.

Anyone who falls so easily into childish insults is immature and not to be taken seriously.

Anyone who can’t stop making infantile boasts just courts derision.

Anyone who calls someone a name and can’t see that that name applies to themselves requires a fitting for a straight jacket.

Some people are beyond hope AS

[AmericanSherlock]

I know.

Thinking about some aspects of the case I get a bit tired of the excuses that are made every time something might count against St.William.

The testimony of Curwen, Wilson and Mather - all creditable people (especially the first two) - they paint a very different picture of the Wallace’s - so they must be wrong or lying.

PC Rothwell - a policeman who knew Wallace, with no axe to grind - said Wallace looked upset - must be wrong or lying.

Wallace says one thing about his route to the chess club - but it must be wrong because it doesn’t fit in with an innocent St.William.

Wallace mentions his wife’s mackintosh to Mrs Johnston - then in his statement said that she’d never worn one - Wallace lied - it’s not important though.

If some people just tookoff the Wallace blinkers they would see what is fairly obvious. That Wallace is by a long distance the likeliest murderer.

Absolutely. The constant denial of admitting anything Wallace did or said could be seen as suspicious at all is pathological in scope.

Contrast this with the 100 percent certainty of a totally unsubstantiated conspiracy theory as the "Correct Solution"!

Insane, unreal bias

[Herlock Sholmes]

What damn part of that can't he grasp?!?!?!?!?

Instead he quotes something else altogether and washes his hands with it!

Chrissakes!

I know.

Thinking about some aspects of the case I get a bit tired of the excuses that are made every time something might count against St.William.

The testimony of Curwen, Wilson and Mather - all creditable people (especially the first two) - they paint a very different picture of the Wallace’s - so they must be wrong or lying.

PC Rothwell - a policeman who knew Wallace, with no axe to grind - said Wallace looked upset - must be wrong or lying.

Wallace says one thing about his route to the chess club - but it must be wrong because it doesn’t fit in with an innocent St.William.

Wallace mentions his wife’s mackintosh to Mrs Johnston - then in his statement said that she’d never worn one - Wallace lied - it’s not important though.

If some people just tookoff the Wallace blinkers they would see what is fairly obvious. That Wallace is by a long distance the likeliest murderer.

[AmericanSherlock]

“How did you go there, by what method ? I do not want
the whole route, but did you walk or go by tram, or how ?
— I walked up Richmond Park, turned the corner by the
Church and up Belmont Road, and there caught a
tram. “

In court, under oath, on trial for his life!

According to the map (unless they were created by leftist conspiracy theorists to persecute St. William) the tram was in Breck Road before you reach Belmont Road. I don’t care that you say about what they would have called it unless , amongst your many talents you are also a Time Lord who has travelled back to 1930’s Anfield to conduct conversations with the locals about the naming of tram stops

UP BELMONT AND THERE CAUGHT A TRAM. (There being Belmont Road....the road that he’d just gone up.

The tram stop at the junction of West Derby (according to the Communist-infiltrated map of course) is actually in Belmont Road.

In both his police statement and his trial testimony St.William says that he caught the tram in Belmont Road. Of the two that we’re discussing only one was actually in Belmont Road. And it’s not the one that you favour.

If you stopped wasting your time drivelling on about trolls (of which you are the only example on this forum) and learned to read and understand English you might be able to keep up.

If you need a supply of paper for your forthcoming book here’s a gift from me and AS

What damn part of that can't he grasp?!?!?!?!?

Instead he quotes something else altogether and washes his hands with it!

Chrissakes!