Can't get past Maxwell

[Robert St Devil]

Reckon that is one of her eyes.

DJA et al

I was always under the impression that the piece circled in DJA's photo was a shadow formed by a flap of skin which was hanging off her forehead and covering her right eye. To me, currently, it looks like a piece of flesh which was cut/"skinned away" extending from the center of her forehead to her right temple & down along the right side of her face (alongside her right cheek). And, the flap of skin is hanging over.

[Harry D]

Good job, Harry. But the eyes are still a struggle which is odd as Barnett claims they were a crucial part of his identification.

Thanks eten. Yeah the eyes are a bugger. I can't make them out at all.

[Abby Normal]

I'll do my best for your Abby:

thanks harry
i do see it now, but seems off center a bit. but you may be right.

[etenguy]

I'll do my best for your Abby:

Good job, Harry. But the eyes are still a struggle which is odd as Barnett claims they were a crucial part of his identification.

[Harry D]

I cant make out ANY facial features at all

I'll do my best for your Abby:

[Abby Normal]

Time for a new brain.

lol! as long as its abnormal too! hilarious pic!!!

[DJA]

Time for a new brain.

[Abby Normal]

I cant make out ANY facial features at all

[Darryl Kenyon]

Just my opinion but could the circled part in DJA's post [ 4220 ], be a stab wound, similar to the one's on Mary's left arm ?

Regards Darryl

[Harry D]

I can make out the mouth and the nose fine. It's the eyes that are a mystery to me.

If you'd told me the killer had destroyed Mary Kelly's eyes, I'd have no cause to disbelieve you.

[DJA]

I was inferring there were no alterations to the 'photo.

What we see is the result of boiling water applied to Mary Kelly's maxilla.

Was explained by an imminent medical researcher on these boards several years ago.

[mpriestnall]

Which alterations ?

Hi DJA, I referring to what was stated in posts numbers 399 and 400.

I said "possible" alterations aka alleged alterations per these posts

I have an open mind to all this and I admit I'm not as familiar with the MJK pictures as perhaps I should be.

Maybe a comparison of different versions of the MJK picture in question might be useful?

Wicks info referencing the observations from two authorities (Bond and Hibbert) from a primary source re the mutilations around the eyes, clearly weakens the case for the reliability of using the eyes for identification. Altered pictures or not.

[DJA]

Which alterations ?

[mpriestnall]

Would love to know what Donald Rumbelow thoughts would be on these possible alterations.

[DJA]

Police cover up