John Richardson

[FISHY1118]

Absolutely no!

The witnesses are not ambiguous in the slightest. Cadosch said that he definitely heard a noise coming from the yard of number 29. Richardson said that he definitely couldn’t have missed a body had it been there. These are the opposite of ambiguous. You are confusing the word ‘ambiguous’ with the word ‘imperfect.’

We cannot assess Phillips so he has to be sidelined. But we certainly can and should assess the witnesses. If we applied your criteria Fishy no case would ever get solved because only perfect witnesses would be considered. I can’t think of a single perfect witness in this case. So do we just stop discussing the case?

Phillips and the witnesses are separate issues and cannot be treated the same.

Absolutly yes . its all been discussed befor, its over, just as trevor suggested . The witnesses are in the same boat as phillips .

t.o.d. is no certainty in either case . Thats been proven pretty much so i reckon

[FISHY1118]

It is indeed Game Over on Phillips. The witnesses are separate matter.

Your the only one who thinks that . Yes indeed they are . Georges post 1320 put that to bed . . Same result everytime ones looks at it .

[FISHY1118]

I prefer the truth to diplomacy.

NO you prefer ignorance and lack diplomacy, unlike trevor who at least tried .

[Herlock Sholmes]

Absolutly yes . its all been discussed befor, its over, just as trevor suggested . The witnesses are in the same boat as phillips .

t.o.d. is no certainty in either case . Thats been proven pretty much so i reckon

It’s impossible to argue with poor reasoning like this.

[FISHY1118]

Only a monumental fool would believe 3 witnesses couldnt either have lied ,been mistaken , embellished their testimony etc, etc,. its only been done like a thousand times over history . Odds have nothing to do with it .

[FISHY1118]

It’s impossible to argue with poor reasoning like this.

Yes indeed we all feel the same way about you too .

[Herlock Sholmes]

Your the only one who thinks that . Yes indeed they are . Georges post 1320 put that to bed . . Same result everytime ones looks at it .

Apparently I’m not because 94% of posters in the last, and quite recent poll, favoured the witnesses.

To say that the Doctors TOD and the witnesses are in the same boat is simply a deliberate ploy to close down a debate. I don’t mind if debate ends. Witnesses over the Doctor to anyone with even a scintilla of reason.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Yes indeed we all feel the same way about you too .

And the 94% of posters who favour the witnesses.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Ok, Fishy is going into babyish, fingers-in-the-ear comment mode. No point in even attempting reasoned debate d sadly.

[FISHY1118]

SO do you want to keep going or maybe you should just except Trevors post ? you know the one where were all aloud to have a different opinion and disagree . Then we can all move on . Everyone else has .

[FISHY1118]

What ever herlock .

[FISHY1118]

And the 94% of posters who favour the witnesses.

Where , in that poll ?

[FISHY1118]

Ok, Fishy is going into babyish, fingers-in-the-ear comment mode. No point in even attempting reasoned debate d sadly.

Is that the same as herlock ''stomping his feet mode'' as trevor and george have suggested ?

[GBinOz]

Apparently I’m not because 94% of posters in the last, and quite recent poll, favoured the witnesses.

To say that the Doctors TOD and the witnesses are in the same boat is simply a deliberate ploy to close down a debate. I don’t mind if debate ends. Witnesses over the Doctor to anyone with even a scintilla of reason.

Herlock,

EVERYONE is by now very well aware of your opinions. NOONE wants another recitation of those opinions with your apparently obligatory insulting conclusion. You have drawn your conclusions, others have drawn theirs. Anyone with even a scintilla of reason will accept that fact graciously.

Cheers, George

[GBinOz]

Not all of us. I believe Annie was murdered closer to 2.30am than 5.30am. I think George is in agreement with this.

Hi FM,

Yes, that would be my considered opinion. Others are free to disagree, and that is their prerogative.

Cheers, George