Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit
View Post
How is it when Richardson claims something under oath then it must be accepted , but when Chandler does the same, we seem to wanted make up all the reasons why it should be discredited ?
Im not sure we can judge as to what the circumstances of their interaction was that morning, i guess its futile to try and put context into such an event when its impossible to know what took place between them. All we can say for sure is what each one claimed to have said happened that morning.
My post #450 explains why its well within the boundaries that one person should not be judged as right or wrong .
Comment