Originally posted by Observer
View Post
Daily News, Oct 1st: Isaac K:"About twenty minutes to one this morning Mr. Diemschitz called me out to the yard"
Daily News, Oct 1st: Abraham Heschberg: "I was one of those who first saw the murdered woman. It was about a quarter to one o'clock, I should think, when I heard a policeman's whistle blown, and came down to see what was the matter."
Daily News, Oct 1st, attributed to Edward Spooner: "In his testimony, Spooner believed that he had first arrived at Dutfield's Yard at "25 minutes to 1", which is plainly erroneous - baring in mind he was fixing times by the closing of the public houses.
There are also other early member accounts that seem to corroborate that the time they were alerted to the body as sometime just before 12:45. I started a thread long ago about the timings given that night, and listed then chronologically, I looked for it to re-post it, but couldnt locate it.
There are a few accounts that state the time the body was discovered, and only 1 account stated it was at 1 or just after....Louis. Only 1 account stated that anything transpired in front of the gates at around 12:45 invovling Liz Stride...Israels. Only 2 accounts state that the passageway was empty at 12:40.....Morris and Lave. And somehow they missed seeing each other in that narrow passage at that same time.
Louis is the club steward, Morris was the nights speaker, Lave is a resident of the cottages, and Israel is rumored to have known Wolff Wess a few years prior to that night. Make of that what you will.
So....the facts are that more witness members stated on the night of the murder that they were alerted to the body before 12:45 than at any other time given by other witnesses, and at least 1 outside source seems to have agreed with that time.
What has been accepted Observer isnt what has been recorded, its just that people have gravitated to the story by Schwartz and the timings of Louis and some of the other club associated members as being the one they prefer.
Its not that there is no evidence for an earlier time...its that an earlier time means people lied and there was no boogyman assault at 12:45. 2 things most are reticent to accept.
I can accept discrepancies on time when I realize just what was at stake for Louis and Morris and Wess if the evidence pointed to someone at the club that night....and I cant accept witness evidence that is not supported in at least some fashion by a formal police presentation of the evidence given.
The timings given for that night provide a loopy story that cannot be accurate, its contradictory and illogical and provides multiple discovery times and uncorroborated stories of assault in the street...so, either some people lied or many people made the same errors.
The ones I believe likely lied are the ones that would be most responsible for the activities on that property that night...which to me makes so much sense I cannot fathom why the idea is resisted so harshly.
Cheers
Comment