Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chapman’s death.
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Embarrassing.
You need to stop typing and start reading.
Forensic expert after Forensic expert. The most respected authorities on the subject. Not ripperologists but published experts. And there’s not a single one Fishy....not one....that supports Phillips. Every single one says that he could not have made an accurate TOD estimation. This is black and white. It’s a non-argument perpetuated by the dishonest. Phillips can be dismissed. He wasn’t a magician. He didn’t have magic hands. He could not have accurately estimate Chapman’s TOD. Why are you desperately continuing this? Are you a Forensic expert? Is Trevor? Is Fish? No but every single one of the people that I’ve quoted is.
Phillips is finished. Anyone that says otherwise is simply allowing bias to lead them into embarrassing positions.
What is embarrassing Herlock is you my friend you . You definitely need to pay more attention when responding to someones post . You have totally ignored what i posted, instead you chose to again waffle waffle waffle about forensic experts blah blah blah . Its been done to death by you over and over , but like always you just refuse to except what is right there in front of you, and that is Long Codosch and Richardson cannot and should not be accepted as proof the time of Chapman death was 5.30am. For god sake man give up , Wolf, Trevor and myself have explain it to you , start listening.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
...
And on that basis I suggest TOD cannot be conclusively be proven, but I do accept that everyone is entitled to their own opinions its how those opinions are formed
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
- Jeff
Comment
-
''I heard a voice say "No" just as I was going through the door. It was not in our yard, but I should ''THINK'' it came from the yard of No. 29. I, however, ''CANNOT SAY'' on which side it came from''. Albert Cadosch
See the difference Herlock, Just the ''think'' and ''cannot say'' changes everything , make sure you use them next time ok .
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post''I heard a voice say "No" just as I was going through the door. It was not in our yard, but I should ''THINK'' it came from the yard of No. 29. I, however, ''CANNOT SAY'' on which side it came from''. Albert Cadosch
See the difference Herlock, Just the ''think'' and ''cannot say'' changes everything , make sure you use them next time ok .
- Jeff
Comment
-
On the day of the murder, , John Richardson made no mention of sitting down on the steps and cutting a piece of leather from his shoe. This is virtually the same story that he told Chandler and thus some doubt is thrown on Richardson's later version of events. There is even more damning evidence which goes against Richardson's story.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JeffHamm View Post
He cannot say on which side of what it came from? Which side of #29?, in which case he's just saying "It was from #29 yard, but which side of the yard I couldn't be sure", but it's still #29 all the same.
- Jeff
Comment
-
He cannot say on which side of what it came from? Which side of #29?, in which case he's just saying "It was from #29 yard, but which side of the yard I couldn't be sure", but it's still #29 all the same.
So you think it was a ''no'' in 29 but with side of 29 ? hmmmmmmmm not sure that one will fly , not sure why anyone would want to try explain which side of the yard a ''no'' came from either left or right , especially in Codoschs case seems irreverent really
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
Please retract this false statement , its misleading
“. As I returned towards the back door I heard a voice say "No" just as I was going through the door. It was not in our yard, but I should think it came from the yard of No. 29. I, however, cannot say on which side it came from.”Regards
Herlock
"Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View PostEmbarrassing.
You need to stop typing and start reading.
Forensic expert after Forensic expert. The most respected authorities on the subject. Not ripperologists but published experts. And there’s not a single one Fishy....not one....that supports Phillips. Every single one says that he could not have made an accurate TOD estimation. This is black and white. It’s a non-argument perpetuated by the dishonest. Phillips can be dismissed. He wasn’t a magician. He didn’t have magic hands. He could not have accurately estimate Chapman’s TOD. Why are you desperately continuing this? Are you a Forensic expert? Is Trevor? Is Fish? No but every single one of the people that I’ve quoted is.
Phillips is finished. Anyone that says otherwise is simply allowing bias to lead them into embarrassing positions.
What is embarrassing Herlock is you my friend you . You definitely need to pay more attention when responding to someones post . You have totally ignored what i posted, instead you chose to again waffle waffle waffle about forensic experts blah blah blah . Its been done to death by you over and over , but like always you just refuse to except what is right there in front of you, and that is Long Codosch and Richardson cannot and should not be accepted as proof the time of Chapman death was 5.30am. For god sake man give up , Wolf, Trevor and myself have explain it to you , start listening.
And so we have three witness who all provide evidence that Chapman died later. The effort that has be expended to try and discredit them by you and others has been frankly an embarrassment to reason, logic and common sense.
No, we cannot say this for certain. No one has said this is 100% certain certain. But it’s overwhelmingly likely.
All you are doing Fishy is embarrassing yourself and the subject by your wish-thinking and very obvious bias. You, Fish and PS all need an earlier TO. To myself, Jon, JohnG, Etenguy, Sam, HarryD, PaulB, Jeff and others the TOD has no bearing on a theory.
And lets face it, who takes anyone seriously that believes the Knight/Sickert theory?
Regards
Herlock
"Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post''I heard a voice say "No" just as I was going through the door. It was not in our yard, but I should ''THINK'' it came from the yard of No. 29. I, however, ''CANNOT SAY'' on which side it came from''. Albert Cadosch
See the difference Herlock, Just the ''think'' and ''cannot say'' changes everything , make sure you use them next time ok .
. but I should ''THINK'' it came from the yard of No. 29.
And when it came to the noise he was absolutely certain.
Grow up.
Regards
Herlock
"Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by PaulB View Post
There's no other way of interpreting what Mr Cadosch said, is there?
- Jeff
Comment
Comment