Inquest: only mentioned womans voice .. a faint "No"
Can you give us your source for "faint". The above is the second time you have used that word with reference to Cadosch's evidence.
According to the inquest report in the Times newspaper:
'As he returned across the yard, to the back door of his house, he heard a voice say quite close to him, "No". He believed it came from No.29.'
As it was 'quite close to him' No.29 seems far more likely than not.
He goes on to say:
'He then heard a sort of a fall against the fence, which divided his yard from No.29 . Something seemed suddenly to touch the fence.'
This is unambiguous, surely. He's referring to this specific fence and no other, isn't he?
As for Mrs Long's evidence. If she was making it all up, why was she certain of some things, but unsure of others? If the whole thing was invention, why not claim to be confident throughout? She quite clearly impressed the coroner, so where is the justification for suggesting that she lied?
I should perhaps point out that I'm not having a go at you. I also have doubts about the evidence of Cadosch, but not for the same reasons.
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment: