Hello Casebook,
There has been recent discussion on the thread Folie a deux, and I do believe it has gone off topic a bit. The main focus now is if the sighting by Isreal Schwartz is reliable or not.
I have a special problem with his testimony because I see many holes in his story.
For example, how did he know the sighting was at 12:45? I do believe he would have a little trouble finding out the time in the fearful rush he was in. Also why did he describe Elizabeth's screams as "she screamed three times and not too loud". This statement makes no sence if you believe she was in any danger at all.
If I may use an example, Fisherman on the Folie a deux thread offered this possibility.
Now, transfer this reasoning to Berner Street, and make the supposition that the man who walks up to Stride is the same man that gave her the flower and kissed her in the doorway an hour earlier. He now finds her, seemingly soliciting, and decides to drag her away with him. They exchange a couple of words:
"What are you doing, Lizzie? You cannot stand here like this!"
"Come off it, I do what I choose to"
"No, you donīt. Come here!"
He pulls, she resists, he looses his grip, and she falls. He calls out in frustration:
"Lizzie!"
Realizing that there are people around (Schwartz and Pipeman) she lowers her voice:
"No, no, no!"
Then why, if this may have happened, did Schwartz run away when he realized he was being followed? Becuase I believe his brain was playing tricks on itself. I believe he saw only a fraction of what really happened and his brain filled in the holes with what it would expect to see and removed any pointless details. I also do not, for one minute believe he just stood there and watched it. I believe he saw a glimps of something he didn't understand fully. Again, this is only a possibility.
It was also mentioned that Schwartz may have adopted a big city "casual walk-past" additude. How is this so if he was an immigrant? Obviously this isnt probable becuase according to him, he passed what he described as a tipsy man approaching the "woman at the enterance of the allyway", he turned around once he heard a quarrel.
Also why were there differences in each story he told? When he told police his account, no man with a knife appears. However, in the October 1st account he does mention a knife weilding man. This is enough to raise suspicion. Also why did the simple act of either Liz being thrown on the ground(police version) and pulled into the yard(star) appear.
Appearently this may be a tale woven by the IWCM to divert suspiceon away from them.
Any thoughts?
There has been recent discussion on the thread Folie a deux, and I do believe it has gone off topic a bit. The main focus now is if the sighting by Isreal Schwartz is reliable or not.
I have a special problem with his testimony because I see many holes in his story.
For example, how did he know the sighting was at 12:45? I do believe he would have a little trouble finding out the time in the fearful rush he was in. Also why did he describe Elizabeth's screams as "she screamed three times and not too loud". This statement makes no sence if you believe she was in any danger at all.
If I may use an example, Fisherman on the Folie a deux thread offered this possibility.
Now, transfer this reasoning to Berner Street, and make the supposition that the man who walks up to Stride is the same man that gave her the flower and kissed her in the doorway an hour earlier. He now finds her, seemingly soliciting, and decides to drag her away with him. They exchange a couple of words:
"What are you doing, Lizzie? You cannot stand here like this!"
"Come off it, I do what I choose to"
"No, you donīt. Come here!"
He pulls, she resists, he looses his grip, and she falls. He calls out in frustration:
"Lizzie!"
Realizing that there are people around (Schwartz and Pipeman) she lowers her voice:
"No, no, no!"
Then why, if this may have happened, did Schwartz run away when he realized he was being followed? Becuase I believe his brain was playing tricks on itself. I believe he saw only a fraction of what really happened and his brain filled in the holes with what it would expect to see and removed any pointless details. I also do not, for one minute believe he just stood there and watched it. I believe he saw a glimps of something he didn't understand fully. Again, this is only a possibility.
It was also mentioned that Schwartz may have adopted a big city "casual walk-past" additude. How is this so if he was an immigrant? Obviously this isnt probable becuase according to him, he passed what he described as a tipsy man approaching the "woman at the enterance of the allyway", he turned around once he heard a quarrel.
Also why were there differences in each story he told? When he told police his account, no man with a knife appears. However, in the October 1st account he does mention a knife weilding man. This is enough to raise suspicion. Also why did the simple act of either Liz being thrown on the ground(police version) and pulled into the yard(star) appear.
Appearently this may be a tale woven by the IWCM to divert suspiceon away from them.
Any thoughts?
Comment