Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Buck's Row?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by John G View PostWhether they were soliciting or not, and frankly there's scant evidence for this in most cases, is incidental. They were targeted not because of their profession but because they were vulnerable. Compare, for example, Peter Sutcliffe, who targeted both prostitutes and non-prostitutes.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Hi Herlock,
There is evidence that Annie Chapman was carried into the back yard of 29 Hanbury Street.
There is evidence that Elizabeth Stride, murdered in Dutfield's Yard, was not Elizabeth Gustaffsdotter from Sweden.
But if you want to cling [cuz it's easy] to the JtR/down on prostitutes trope, please be my guest.
Regards,
SimonNever believe anything until it has been officially denied.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Herlock,
There is evidence that Annie Chapman was carried into the back yard of 29 Hanbury Street.
There is evidence that Elizabeth Stride, murdered in Dutfield's Yard, was not Elizabeth Gustaffsdotter from Sweden.
But if you want to cling [cuz it's easy] to the JtR/down on prostitutes trope, please be my guest.
Regards,
Simon
I can't recall anyone at the time thinking that she'd been carried into the yard at Hanbury Street?
This is not 'clinging to a trope.' Even if they weren't full-time prostitutes these were desperately poor women who had almost no other means of support. I can't recall the exact figure but weren't there 80,000 prostitutes in the east end? Prostitution amongst the poorest class of women was rife. It's overwhelmingly likely that at least some of them resorted to prostitution.
I'm not saying that they were killed due to some hatred of prostitutes but it's a possibility. A sexual motive or just a hatred of women in general are also possible motives. Not as exciting as a conspiracy but hey...Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostI remember an earlier 'possible' victim in a country lane. She wasn't a prostitute and she survived.
His first known victim was a 14 year old school girl who he attacked down a quiet country lane. All of his six latter victims, two of whom survived, were non- prostitutes. In fact, one of these surviving victims was just 16 years old, and was attacked whilst returning home after buying some cigarettes.
Sutcliffe himself acknowledge that, following the murder of Vera Millwood, "I now realised I had the urge to kill any woman and I thought this would eventually get me caught but I think in my subconscious this is what I really wanted."Last edited by John G; 08-22-2017, 01:02 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostThere is evidence that Annie Chapman was carried into the back yard of 29 Hanbury Street.
If you are actually considering evidence now, what about the testimony of Amelia Farmer, who, unlike you, actually knew Chapman, and who said of her:
"...she was not very particular what she did to earn a living and at times used to remain out very late at night...the last five years she had been living an irregular life."
What do you think she meant by that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostI can't recall anyone at the time thinking that she'd been carried into the yard at Hanbury St
"In your opinion did she enter the yard alive? - I am positive of it. I made a thorough search of the passage, and I saw no trace of blood, which must have been visible had she been taken into the yard."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostForgive a spot of self-publicity, but there is a section in the revised edition of my book which deals with the subject of Annie Chapman possibly being carried into the back yard of 29 Hanbury Street.
Comment
-
Also with regard to Chapman John Richardson said that he'd had cause to turn men and women out of the passageway in the past. This was obviously a regularly used haunt for prostitutes.
About MJK not being a prostitute:
Lizzie Albrook said, speaking of Kelly: "...and warned me against going on the streets as she had done."
Elizabeth Foster: "She was as nice a woman as one could find, and although she was an unfortunate,..."
Julia Venturney: "I have heard him (Barnett) say that he didn't like her going out on the streets."
I think we see a pattern here....Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostAbout MJK not being a prostitute:
Lizzie Albrook said, speaking of Kelly: "...and warned me against going on the streets as she had done."
Elizabeth Foster: "She was as nice a woman as one could find, and although she was an unfortunate,..."
Julia Venturney: "I have heard him (Barnett) say that he didn't like her going out on the streets."
I think we see a pattern here....
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostTo which we can add the statement of Joseph Barnett: "I have lived with her altogether about 18 months...until last Tuesday week when in consequence of...her resorting to prostitution, I resolved on leaving her...She also told me that she had obtained her livelihood as a prostitute for some considerable time before I took her from the streets."
How do you deduce that MJK made her living?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment