The 1910 Paris Torso killer...
But crucially it says...
"An OLD convict"
BUT then states he was 28?!
These 2 details do not match and I believe the age of 28 is incorrect.
How can an OLD convict be only 28?
If he was indeed 28, then he couldn't have been the Paris Torso killer in almost the same location 18 years prior in 1892.
However, if he was an OLD convict and the age of 28 is a misprint, then he could have been the Paris Torso killer of 1892 also.
Thoughts please?
RD
Comment