Originally posted by Harry D
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Probibility of Martha Tabram Being a JtR Victim
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
Eight months is a long time considering the short gaps between the canonical murders. Yes I believe Bury was the Ripper however I'm not some lunatic who wouldn't be willing to accept overwhelming evidence that does not conform to that belief. However McKenzie was not a Ripper victim. I'm not the only one who believes this. I think you'll find most do not believe she was a Ripper victim and with good reason.
Tabram in Aug and McKenzie in July.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
Eight months is a long time considering the short gaps between the canonical murders. Yes I believe Bury was the Ripper however I'm not some lunatic who wouldn't be willing to accept overwhelming evidence that does not conform to that belief. However McKenzie was not a Ripper victim. I'm not the only one who believes this. I think you'll find most do not believe she was a Ripper victim and with good reason.
Originally posted by John Wheat View PostI think you'll find most do not believe she was a Ripper victim and with good reason.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post
Serial killers can't possibly have downtime, John? There couldn't be possibly be any reason for an eight month time gap? For example, incarceration, illness, travel, or something even more mundane?
There are good reasons, John, but the signature in McKenzie's murder gives her the edge over the proximity in Tabram's imo. Anyway, there was certainly no consensus on the Ripper's tally, and to appeal to one is rather spurious reasoning.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
I don't however see how you can rule Bury out as The Ripper by a victim who may not have been a victim of the Ripper and that to me is rather spurious reasoning.
No doubt you will argue "xyz" for the above, and you may be right, but we have "xyz" for McKenzie, who has more signature Ripper elements than Ellen Bury.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post
Ellen Bury's throat was not cut. Her murderer was known to her. Her mutilations were tamer than Alice McKenzie (whom you rule out definitively).
No doubt you will argue "xyz" for the above, and you may be right, but we have "xyz" for McKenzie, who has more signature Ripper elements than Ellen Bury.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View PostI don't see how her murderer being known to her is a point against Bury being the Ripper
Originally posted by John Wheat View Postquite the opposite in fact it may explain the tamer mutilations.
Originally posted by John Wheat View PostAlso we don't know if the Ripper new any of his victims.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post
Because the majority of serial killer victims aren't known to them, at least not intimately.
How so? If anything, it's peculiar for the Ripper NOT to go to town on someone he has a close connection with.
See my first point.
Comment
-
-
As I showed in Table 2 of “The Bury ID” (http://williambury.org/blog6/the-bury-id/), the underlying signature structures of the Martha Tabram and Ellen Bury murders are virtually identical. The signature of a serial killer tends to remain very stable, and the combination of signature characteristics on display in the two murders is extremely rare. Given that the MO of a serial killer can vary among crime scenes, the use of a different MO in the two murders does not override or negate the close signature match. Tabram belongs to Jack (Bury).
“When a major serial killer case is finally solved and all the paperwork completed, police are sometimes amazed at how obvious the killer was and how they were unable to see what was right before their noses.” —Robert D. Keppel and William J. Birnes, The Psychology of Serial Killer Investigations
William Bury, Victorian Murderer
http://www.williambury.org
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post
McKenzie fits the Ripper signature (left carotid artery severed and lower-body mutilated) much better than Tabram, or even Ellen Bury for that matter.
“When a major serial killer case is finally solved and all the paperwork completed, police are sometimes amazed at how obvious the killer was and how they were unable to see what was right before their noses.” —Robert D. Keppel and William J. Birnes, The Psychology of Serial Killer Investigations
William Bury, Victorian Murderer
http://www.williambury.org
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
Point to a better suspect than Bury then?
Besides, I've always said Bury is the better of the named suspects. None of the others can be proven to have committed a Ripper-ish murder, and there are solid arguments for the lack of overkill/throat cutting. However, Alice McKenzie's murder still has more similarities to the series than Ellen Bury's does, and therefore it leaves serious question marks about him as the killer.
Comment
Comment