Originally posted by Simon Wood
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mary Jane was murdered between 09.00 and 10.30 am
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
And that also confuses, you say the name USED by the victim at no 13 was NOT MJK.
Which implies that everyone lied about the name the person living there used.
That it was not the real name of the woman, I agree 100% .
I was asking Simon if that is what he means, that it was not the real name, or does he mean something else entirely.
Steve
Regards, Jon S.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
FWIW I believe someone was murdered in Miller's Court but it wasn't Kelly.
I understand why "seanr" is somewhat skeptical of the Clayton Street sighting because of the timing, if one accepts the early morning murder time.
On the other hand, it fits very well with Maxwell's, Lewis's and the anonymous women's later sightings of "Kelly".
I am yet to check, but I suspect the description given will fit well with Packer's and/or Schwartz's descriptions.
I'm personally very excited by this sighting because it's consistent with the three aforementioned later Miller's Court sightings and the idea
of the "Kelly" survival theory.Last edited by mpriestnall; 08-16-2023, 05:35 PM.Sapere Aude
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Abby,
No one was murdered in Millers Court.
Simon"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View PostAs Wick points out Mary Kelly is probably an alias . Mary [ if indeed that was her first name ], possibly had good reason for inventing a back story and name. If Caroline Maxwell was talking to someone else they might have used the alias as well, [ interchangeable identities may have caused confusion for anyone looking for said girls ]. Would that person [ if Maxwell was talking to someone else she believed to be MJK ], then come forward and give their real name ? If she was in fear for herself for whatever reason, I doubt it.
Just a thought, Darryl
One witness even said the victim lived upstairs, and had a child. So, we can see some witnesses were confused as to who had been murdered. Maxwell, must have had her own opinion on who the victim was.
I already mentioned that Maxwell admitted to having not seen Kelly for 3 weeks, and in her police statement she said she had known deceased woman during the past 4 months, at the inquest this changed to 'known her for 4 months', thats not quite the same thing.
Again, to police she said she was on speaking terms with her, but at court she admitted to having never spoken to her, except twice.
Another odd comment at court from Maxwell was, "I took a deal of notice of deceased this evening seeing her standing at the corner of the court on Friday from 8 to half past".
What did she mean by "this evening"?
Maxwell also admitted in court that when she saw the victim with a man at the end of the street, she says, "I saw them in the distance, I am certain it was deceased", they were too far away for her to give a description of them.
Too many inconsistencies, it leaves me wondering if she is trying to salvage her mistake in whom she thought the victim was.
Regards, Jon S.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Abby
Your option No. 2.
Simon
Seriously though, you are the first one Ive ever heard to take that dramatic a position on this crime, and knowing you a bit, Im sure its not without some compelling evidence. Looking forward to the details.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Michael,
Thank you.
I don't think you'll be disappointed.
SimonLast edited by Michael W Richards; 08-16-2023, 07:44 PM.
Comment
Comment