Room 13 Miller's Court

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • paul emmett
    replied
    Originally posted by John Casey View Post
    Ah...it's all beginning to make a bit more sense now. I suppose the staircase, if it was anchored to anything, was anchored to the original dividing wall...
    It has to be anchored to something, doesn't it? And I do think that your assumption here makes the most sense. I had brought up the 26 which is there to suggest that maybe the recycled door was the partition.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Casey
    replied
    Originally posted by Stephen Thomas View Post
    Yes, John, there was a partition, made of wood and two storeys high. Behind it was a staircase, not originally part of the house, that allowed access for tenants to the upper floors of #26 after the ground floor became 'The Shed', a storeroom for costermongers' barrows.
    Ah...it's all beginning to make a bit more sense now. I suppose the staircase, if it was anchored to anything, was anchored to the original dividing wall...

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Hi John

    Our posts crossed. Yes, you've got it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi All,

    For as long as I can remember the 'bed' side wall of Room 13 has been referred to as a partition wall, and various accounts have described it as constructed from 'matchwood'—interlocking 'tongue and groove' strips of wood still used today.

    Anyway, the upshot appears to be that the wall was of an improvised nature, put up to create a discrete living space.

    If my geography of 26 Millers Court is correct, directly on the other side of the partition wall was the staircase leading to the upstairs floors.

    How does a flimsy partition wall support a staircase? And what supported the staircase before the partition was put up?

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by John Casey View Post
    One thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house. Is there any evidence for this? I'm just trying to imagine why you would NEED a partition. If the room was the original parlour of the main house, there would already be a dividing wall, right? So all you'd need to do would be to block or lock the connecting door. Or am I missing something so obvious that I'll kick myself when it's pointed out to me!!?
    Yes, John, there was a partition, made of wood and two storeys high. Behind it was a staircase, not originally part of the house, that allowed access for tenants to the upper floors of #26 after the ground floor became 'The Shed', a storeroom for costermongers' barrows.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Casey
    replied
    Just had a thought....Liz Prater said she could see light coming through the wall as she walked upstairs to her flat, so I wonder if the partition was built to accomodate the staircase? Presumably if there was a family living at the front of the house (not quite sure on that point) they wouldnt want Elizabeth traipsing into their house to get to her flat upstairs....which begs the question, where was the entrance that she would have used? But that I suppose is technically not a question about Room 13, maybe there should be a seperate thread for that one...

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Actually, whether there's a number there or not - the implication being that the partition contained a recycled front door - it doesn't really help us decide whether the partition extended further than the width of the parlour doorway. There might have been four or five such panels "daisy-chained" together along the full length of the southern "wall"

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Norder
    replied
    Some people think they see a 26 on the back wall... but of course some people think they see an "FM," and a crown and/or cross, and all manner of other writing back there.

    Leave a comment:


  • paul emmett
    replied
    Originally posted by John Casey View Post
    One thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house. Is there any evidence for this?
    Hi, John, Sam.

    There's the "26" on the back "wall," which supports what both you and Sam are saying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by John Casey View Post
    One thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house.
    Hi John,

    As far as I know, it might well have covered only that part of the room where the entrance to the parlour had once been. I don't think it's mentioned anywhere that the partition occupied the entire length of the room.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Casey
    replied
    One thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house. Is there any evidence for this? I'm just trying to imagine why you would NEED a partition. If the room was the original parlour of the main house, there would already be a dividing wall, right? So all you'd need to do would be to block or lock the connecting door. Or am I missing something so obvious that I'll kick myself when it's pointed out to me!!?

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    It just goes to show that there are more things one can learn here than just names and dates and cuts and slashes...like how to construct a valid argument for debate. Im learning....slowly....

    I will join that later today Stewart, thank you PC Evans....carry on.

    My best regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Stewart,

    Your kind words are appreciated and are fully reciprocated in every respect.

    Good idea about another thread. See you all there later

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Newbie

    Originally posted by perrymason View Post
    Just one last thing before work......I had to laugh out loud after posting my comments and realized that with our post system of promotions, I'm a Detective and Mr Evans is a Constable.
    Talk about mislabeling. Like finding Ketchup in a Peanut Butter Jar.
    Cheers all.
    Hey, I'm the newbie in these parts.

    It's all very well to speculate, surmise, debate, opinionate, throat-shove &c &c. But I do like facts, in as much as we have any facts in this case. Anyway, migrate to the other thread I am starting to discuss the 'Prater's room' issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Just one last thing before work......I had to laugh out loud after posting my comments and realized that with our post system of promotions, I'm a Detective and Mr Evans is a Constable.

    Talk about mislabeling. Like finding Ketchup in a Peanut Butter Jar.

    Cheers all.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X