Originally posted by John Casey
View Post
Room 13 Miller's Court
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Stephen Thomas View PostYes, John, there was a partition, made of wood and two storeys high. Behind it was a staircase, not originally part of the house, that allowed access for tenants to the upper floors of #26 after the ground floor became 'The Shed', a storeroom for costermongers' barrows.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi All,
For as long as I can remember the 'bed' side wall of Room 13 has been referred to as a partition wall, and various accounts have described it as constructed from 'matchwood'—interlocking 'tongue and groove' strips of wood still used today.
Anyway, the upshot appears to be that the wall was of an improvised nature, put up to create a discrete living space.
If my geography of 26 Millers Court is correct, directly on the other side of the partition wall was the staircase leading to the upstairs floors.
How does a flimsy partition wall support a staircase? And what supported the staircase before the partition was put up?
Regards,
Simon
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Casey View PostOne thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house. Is there any evidence for this? I'm just trying to imagine why you would NEED a partition. If the room was the original parlour of the main house, there would already be a dividing wall, right? So all you'd need to do would be to block or lock the connecting door. Or am I missing something so obvious that I'll kick myself when it's pointed out to me!!?
Leave a comment:
-
Just had a thought....Liz Prater said she could see light coming through the wall as she walked upstairs to her flat, so I wonder if the partition was built to accomodate the staircase? Presumably if there was a family living at the front of the house (not quite sure on that point) they wouldnt want Elizabeth traipsing into their house to get to her flat upstairs....which begs the question, where was the entrance that she would have used? But that I suppose is technically not a question about Room 13, maybe there should be a seperate thread for that one...
Leave a comment:
-
Actually, whether there's a number there or not - the implication being that the partition contained a recycled front door - it doesn't really help us decide whether the partition extended further than the width of the parlour doorway. There might have been four or five such panels "daisy-chained" together along the full length of the southern "wall"
Leave a comment:
-
Some people think they see a 26 on the back wall... but of course some people think they see an "FM," and a crown and/or cross, and all manner of other writing back there.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Casey View PostOne thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house. Is there any evidence for this?
There's the "26" on the back "wall," which supports what both you and Sam are saying.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Casey View PostOne thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house.
As far as I know, it might well have covered only that part of the room where the entrance to the parlour had once been. I don't think it's mentioned anywhere that the partition occupied the entire length of the room.
Leave a comment:
-
One thing I've always wondered about. People talk about there being a "partition" between Kelly's room and the rest of the house. Is there any evidence for this? I'm just trying to imagine why you would NEED a partition. If the room was the original parlour of the main house, there would already be a dividing wall, right? So all you'd need to do would be to block or lock the connecting door. Or am I missing something so obvious that I'll kick myself when it's pointed out to me!!?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedIt just goes to show that there are more things one can learn here than just names and dates and cuts and slashes...like how to construct a valid argument for debate. Im learning....slowly....
I will join that later today Stewart, thank you PC Evans....carry on.
My best regards.
Leave a comment:
-
Stewart,
Your kind words are appreciated and are fully reciprocated in every respect.
Good idea about another thread. See you all there later
Leave a comment:
-
Newbie
Originally posted by perrymason View PostJust one last thing before work......I had to laugh out loud after posting my comments and realized that with our post system of promotions, I'm a Detective and Mr Evans is a Constable.
Talk about mislabeling.Like finding Ketchup in a Peanut Butter Jar.
Cheers all.
It's all very well to speculate, surmise, debate, opinionate, throat-shove &c &c. But I do like facts, in as much as we have any facts in this case. Anyway, migrate to the other thread I am starting to discuss the 'Prater's room' issue.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedJust one last thing before work......I had to laugh out loud after posting my comments and realized that with our post system of promotions, I'm a Detective and Mr Evans is a Constable.
Talk about mislabeling.Like finding Ketchup in a Peanut Butter Jar.
Cheers all.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: