Kellys in the Scots Guards

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Garry Wroe
    Chief Inspector
    • May 2009
    • 1572

    #136
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
    And I would not doubt you Garry, but you will understand that this source needs to surface to help substantiate the claim one way or the other.
    Agreed, Jon, but you can take it as read that it exists and is sitting in the Colindale archives for anyone who cares to look for it.

    Comment

    • Debra A
      Assistant Commissioner
      • Feb 2008
      • 3504

      #137
      Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
      Hi Debra,

      Sorry. I obviously missed the post. Didn't mean to steal your thunder.

      Regards, Bridewell.
      But it's really not about anyone stealing anyone else's thunder, and if that's the way my post came across rather than genuinely wanting you to post anything further that you find seeing as you are obviously interested in the same line of research as me, then either there's a strange new breed of attitude afoot or I really do speak jibberish in my posts.

      Comment

      • Debra A
        Assistant Commissioner
        • Feb 2008
        • 3504

        #138
        Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
        Hello Debs. Ah, now the light bulb has come on. You mean like the tradition where Smith becomes Smitty?

        Makes sense.

        Cheers.
        LC
        Something like that, Lynn, kind of connected to military tradition maybe- Smith becomes Smudge, Clark is Nobby, Stride is Long even?

        Comment

        • Cogidubnus
          Assistant Commissioner
          • Feb 2012
          • 3266

          #139
          Since nobody else has asked....

          Hi Debs

          I think daylight is gradually dawning...

          Now, to get to the crunch, the interesting question (and I just bet you've got an answer already!) how many Johnstons/Johnstones, and how many likely to be, say, London-based?

          (I'd guess quite a few as, alas, it's not an uncommon name)

          All the best

          Dave

          Comment

          • lynn cates
            Commisioner
            • Aug 2009
            • 13841

            #140
            military

            Hello Debs. Thanks. That is quite plausible. Military lads and lasses are prone to do such.

            Cheers.
            LC

            Comment

            • Debra A
              Assistant Commissioner
              • Feb 2008
              • 3504

              #141
              Originally posted by Cogidubnus View Post
              Hi Debs

              I think daylight is gradually dawning...

              Now, to get to the crunch, the interesting question (and I just bet you've got an answer already!) how many Johnstons/Johnstones, and how many likely to be, say, London-based?

              (I'd guess quite a few as, alas, it's not an uncommon name)

              All the best

              Dave
              Hi Dave, yes it is a very common name and they are all over the place. There are Irish Johns(t)ons living in Wales and working in the iron industry and with daughters named Mary Jane even!
              But researching the name Johnston in connection with MJK would be pointless unless perhaps there was a family that obviously fitted all the same criteria as the MJK's Kellys. Other than that, if MJK lied about her name she may have lied about everything, or even just some small part. Either way it becomes impossible to 'weigh up' any Johnston family finds?

              My main interest is not in researching Johnstons but that Jonto is linked to that surname as a nickname.
              I am leaning towards the opinion offered by others, that Johnto probably was a lover rather than a brother. Perhaps he may even be the man MJK took to sleep at Mrs Carthy's one night if this 'brother' really did visit her in Whitechapel?

              Comment

              • Bridewell
                Commissioner
                • Apr 2011
                • 4038

                #142
                Gibberish?!

                Originally posted by Debra A View Post
                But it's really not about anyone stealing anyone else's thunder, and if that's the way my post came across rather than genuinely wanting you to post anything further that you find seeing as you are obviously interested in the same line of research as me, then either there's a strange new breed of attitude afoot or I really do speak jibberish in my posts.
                Debra, you never speak gibberish. I was just a little annoyed at myself for having missed what you'd posted.

                Regards, Bridewell.
                I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                Comment

                • Garry Wroe
                  Chief Inspector
                  • May 2009
                  • 1572

                  #143
                  Originally posted by Debra A View Post
                  My main interest is not in researching Johnstons but that Jonto is linked to that surname as a nickname.
                  Me too.

                  I am leaning towards the opinion offered by others, that Johnto probably was a lover rather than a brother. Perhaps he may even be the man MJK took to sleep at Mrs Carthy's one night if this 'brother' really did visit her in Whitechapel?
                  It would certainly be interesting if someone could identify a Johnston (or some variant thereof) who was serving in the Scots Guards during the relevant timeframe, especially a Johnston who was married at the time and who might therefore have been reluctant to admit to his relationship with Mary Jane.

                  Comment

                  • lynn cates
                    Commisioner
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 13841

                    #144
                    hypothesis

                    Hello Debs.

                    "Perhaps he may even be the man MJK took to sleep at Mrs Carthy's one night if this 'brother' really did visit her in Whitechapel?"

                    Splendid hypothesis. Has a general time frame for that event been established? The wording makes it look fairly close to her TOD.

                    Cheers.
                    LC

                    Comment

                    • Debra A
                      Assistant Commissioner
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 3504

                      #145
                      Originally posted by Garry Wroe View Post
                      It would certainly be interesting if someone could identify a Johnston (or some variant thereof) who was serving in the Scots Guards during the relevant timeframe, especially a Johnston who was married at the time and who might therefore have been reluctant to admit to his relationship with Mary Jane.
                      Fourteen men with the surname Johnston or variations come up in an initial search of men attested to the Scots Guards (all Battalions) between 1868-1888, including a Henry and a Harry.
                      I will have to look through the whole file on each of them to be able to narrow down which of them were actually serving in the 2nd Battalion in 1888.

                      Comment

                      • Debra A
                        Assistant Commissioner
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 3504

                        #146
                        Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                        Hello Debs.

                        Splendid hypothesis. Has a general time frame for that event been established? The wording makes it look fairly close to her TOD.

                        Cheers.
                        LC
                        Hi Lynn,
                        I'd have to check back as I'm not entirely sure.
                        If it was close to Mary's time of death then it couldn't be a serving 2nd B Scots Guard as the 2nd Battalion left London for Dublin on the 6th September 1888 to take over from the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards stationed there.

                        Comment

                        • Cogidubnus
                          Assistant Commissioner
                          • Feb 2012
                          • 3266

                          #147
                          I am leaning towards the opinion offered by others, that Johnto probably was a lover rather than a brother. Perhaps he may even be the man MJK took to sleep at Mrs Carthy's one night if this 'brother' really did visit her in Whitechapel?
                          Hi Debs

                          Belatedly, yes that was my feeling too, hence my query...in particular the London connection (though he may've just spent some duty time or leave there). It's still all a bit "thin" at this time distance though isn't it? (Of course just about everything is though really!). Must drive you mad sometimes!

                          All the best

                          Dave

                          Comment

                          • lynn cates
                            Commisioner
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 13841

                            #148
                            Carthy sighting

                            Hello Debs. Thanks. I think that is one of the best MJK's sighting out there. That "gentleman" with her is extremely interesting.

                            Cheers.
                            LC

                            Comment

                            • Wickerman
                              Commissioner
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 14865

                              #149
                              Originally posted by Debra A View Post
                              Also, if you look back at my earlier posts you will see I don't go with the 'Ianto' idea either, I also mentioned the pronunciation would be totally different for Abberline to have written it down as Johnto from Barnett's dictation, so I have no idea where you got the idea I was championing the 'Ianto' version over 'John too'.
                              Yes I now see where you might think that. Its not what I was meaning. In responding to you that "Ianto" is being championed, I was not meaning by you specifically. I could have worded it better.

                              Originally posted by Debra A View Post
                              If it was close to Mary's time of death then it couldn't be a serving 2nd B Scots Guard as the 2nd Battalion left London for Dublin on the 6th September 1888 to take over from the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards stationed there.
                              Incidently, I don't see any allusion to a timeline in Barnett's words, and he does tell us himself that the regiment was in Ireland.

                              Regards, Jon S.
                              Regards, Jon S.

                              Comment

                              • Cogidubnus
                                Assistant Commissioner
                                • Feb 2012
                                • 3266

                                #150
                                Incidently, I don't see any allusion to a timeline in Barnett's words, and he does tell us himself that the regiment was in Ireland.
                                Which in itself is interesting for obvious reasons. ie Unless he's a Scots Guards Enthusiast (extremely dubious!) how does he know...only likely answer...Mary told him, which comes close to proving at least part of his testimony. (I'm sure I heard or read that somewhere before, incidentally, and wouldn't want you to think I'm claiming it's an original thought!)

                                Dave

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X