If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
". . . BS-man, after spending considerable time (see numerous witness statements of seeing the two) and perhaps money (cachous and flower) and not being able to finagle her into a dark alley had got fed up and left, only to lose his temper and return to Liz and assault her."
And whilst gone, he must have obtained alcohol--if Schwartz is accurate.
". . . BS-man, after spending considerable time (see numerous witness statements of seeing the two) and perhaps money (cachous and flower) and not being able to finagle her into a dark alley had got fed up and left, only to lose his temper and return to Liz and assault her."
And whilst gone, he must have obtained alcohol--if Schwartz is accurate.
Cheers.
LC
No-he could have been drunk already.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
While I fully concede that Schwartz may not have left us with a completely accurate picture for whatever reason (and any ulterior motive for this would be impossible to guess, never mind establish, so that way madness lies), there are bits of his testimony that don't quite fit with wholesale invention.
If he invented a threatening, bigoted thug in the shape of BS man, for example, shouting "Lipski!" while assaulting Stride, why did he invent Pipe Man, and why did he say he didn't know which man "Lipski" was aimed at? When someone makes up a story involving himself, and no other witness can contradict him, he can generally supply all the answers - precisely because he is making it up. Why pretend not to 'know' a detail like this about an incident he invented in the first place? He could have thoroughly milked it, by saying BS man looked directly at him, a Jew, and spat the word out to scare him off.
You can wish Schwartz's tale out of the picture all you like, but then what? You are left with just another dead unfortunate, and the pony and cart really could have disturbed her killer before he could do more than cut her throat!
Hello Abby. So then the drunken condition is what caused Liz to give him a miss?
Cheers.
LC
Maybe part of it. Her reluctance was probably more to do with:
Not wanting to go right into it (having sex)with a prospective new boyfriend
Not wanting to engage in prostitution activity at the time
Somewhat fearful of going into a dark alley with the ripper scare
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
If he invented a threatening, bigoted thug in the shape of BS man, for example, shouting "Lipski!" while assaulting Stride, why did he invent Pipe Man, and why did he say he didn't know which man "Lipski" was aimed at?
Given the clear language barrier could the man have said "Lizzie!" as has been suggested before now.
I doubt that Schwartz would have known who "Lipski" was - though the police may have jumped to that conclusion, as they DID know all about that case.
Comment