Quien?
Hello Simon. Thanks for that.
Any idea whom?
Cheers.
LC
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Arbeter Fraint's Take
Collapse
X
-
Melville?
Hello Spiro. That is correct. Wess believed that the club was being watched.
Was it Melville, perchance?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
perspective
Hello Robert.
"The horse shied to the right? Don't they mean left?"
Well, if one were up the yard, watching from the door or printing office, it would be correct.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
possibilities
Hello Debs. That's one good possibility. But neither did he know the duo involved in the chase, yet they are mentioned.
Of course, it could be that he wished to distance himself and the club from the story.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Secret Police files
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello All. Here is the Arbeter Fraint's take on the "Double Event."
Note:
1. The TOD.
2. The grapes story.
3. Complete absence of the Schwartz story.
Cheers.
LC
[P. 3, col. 2]
[Regular] police and secret police arrived en masse. Everyone who had been in the club was examined, their hands and their clothing inspected, to see if there were blood stains. Everyone’s names and addresses were taken, and everyone was questioned as to whether they had seen anything unusual. During these examinations the police inspector received a telegram [saying] that in Meyter Square near Duke Street Oldgate, another woman had been murdered.
Anyone know who that Special Branch officer was and what he wrote of the Berner Street murder? I included his story in my book.
Leave a comment:
-
The horse shied to the right? Don't they mean left?
Interesting to see the expression "big shot."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Roy. Thanks.
Some of the piece seems to have been drawn from contemporary news accounts. Of course, the Schwartz story was one of the bigger of its kind. Seems to me it should have been included.
Cheers.
LC
Only the Star reported Schwartz's story in detail didn't they?
Dare I say this?...it makes me think that perhaps Wess didn't have a clue who Schwartz was and didn't do any interpreting for him...or is that going too far?
Leave a comment:
-
inclusion
Hello Roy. Thanks.
Some of the piece seems to have been drawn from contemporary news accounts. Of course, the Schwartz story was one of the bigger of its kind. Seems to me it should have been included.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View PostI agree and don't see the connection between Schwartz and the club. Nor with Wess. The Echo piece simply has Wess relating he heard about some men chasing down the street. Not Schwartz. Not him translating for Schwartz.
Roy
I think your point about the Echo article and that Wess was relaying what was told to him- with particular emphasis on the incident not involving a club member(?) is a good one.
That's probably why the journalist didn't mention it in the AF-no point-the club members already knew they had no involvement?
Leave a comment:
-
In the Echo, William Wess is relating something he heard. If he was told the name of the man giving chase he can't remember it. But whatever he was told, it didn't, to his knowledge, concern one of his club members.
Roy
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Roy,
"The man pursued escaped, however, and the secretary of the Club cannot remember the name of the man who gave chase, but he is not a member of their body."
How would Wess have remembered the man's name or known he wasn't a club member?
Regards,
Simon
Leave a comment:
-
That's not a problem, Simon, because in the Echo William Wess only recounts the chase second hand. Something he heard about. He didn't say "I saw the chase."
Roy
Leave a comment:
-
Hi All,
The only problem with Wess's account of the chase is that, according to his own inquest testimony, he was at home at the time of the incident.
Regards,
Simon
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Fisherman,
Thank you. I completely forgot about Blackwell's spillage.
How many doctors does it take to remove cachous from a dead hand?
Answers on a $20 bill, please.
Regards,
Simon
Are you suggesting somethěng amiss Simon? Surely not!
Be careful, you'll get hung for implied subterfuge and jiggery pokery.
Kindly
Phil
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: