If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
No problem, Corey. And I can tell you I've been in this thread through almost the beginning and it has been highjacked A LOT (so sorry, C.D.). Now, as it's already morning in Oz, let the thread take its natural course, with Adam and Tom starting fighting about the Fanny – much later on today.
And Adam, you can't believe how relieved I am that you turned up and chose to attack someone else than me. Fair bits, mate...
All I will say is this, so not to continue, as you say, the killing of this thread. One of Spry's rules say if you want to discuss a problem with someone, do so by PM, which is why I PM you, as not to disrupt the thread.
Corey 123 wrote:
Frankly I don't care if you read it or not, what got to me was you pretty much said it had little worth, when you offer nothing of worth to ripperology as of yet( at least that I have seen, publication wise, not saying I have either by the way).
Corey, I'm the first to admit I'm a bit severe that way, but I happen to firmly believe that the point of publishing an article or book is to bring forward new information acquired through research and/or the discussion of new ideas and interpretations brought forward by the author. I've never published anything that was not both in my own field. Actually, I'd rather die that do this.
You can read almost the entire David Yost book in the link posted in my post #793. In 2 instances there are about 20 pages unavailable, and in another one another 50 pages missing. Bear in mind that on amazon and on GoogleBooks availability changes from day to day, so it can be that one day you might have even the entire book available, so it's totally worth it to re-visit the link.
As for not having yet offered nothing to Ripperology (duh), I'd love to try, in a few weeks, and particularly in the next months. Obviously trying doesn't guarantee finding anything, especially if there isn't anything (having survived) to be found.
As for the (“comparatively polite“) PMs, I'm more for carrying an aggressive discussion out in the open, in front of witnesses, but let's not continue killing this thread, and yes, for the most part due to my untimely, chatty contribution, for which I profusely apologize to all.
How many times do I need to ask you for your sources and evidence for Mrs. Mortimer's own words "almost the entire time" being, in fact, a ten minute gap which just happened to conveniently squeeze in between everybody elses testimony? I have been asking repeatedly for the sources on this since before the article was even published, and i'm still yet to see any.
As far as the vast majority of proof goes, and certainly everything viable that I am aware of, Mortimer's claim was that she was at her door between 12.30 and 1, and only saw Goldstein during that time - in which case, no matter how many excuses you want to make or how many facts you want to twist, her statements simply don't fit in with the known facts.
To Debra Arif:
A thousand apologies for mentioning you like this, Debra, I shouldn't have, really. I was referring to the socialist pamphlets you were going through, but I know it's not your most important point of research right now. There's something I want to try at the Marlborough Courts in about 2 weeks about which I'd like to ask your opinion, but it has time. Plus I'd like to ask your opinion about something pertaining to Cavendish Bentink and his stepmother, but this has TONS of time. Many-many apologies for mentioning these here.
Frankly I don't care if you read it or not, what got to me was you pretty much said it had little worth, when you offer nothing of worth to ripperology as of yet( at least that I have seen, publication wise, not saying I have either by the way).
I hadn't read the book yet, so asking you the contents would be redundant. Also, I don't wish to argue with you, I just wanted my views seen, as you seemed to ignore my, comparitively polite PMs.
The TRULY new information to come out pertaining to Berner Street will be coming out in the next 2 years, and it pertains to research currently conducted by Debra Arif and Lynn Cates (and myself, for whatever's worth).
Corey,
Chill. It's pretty clear that I'm referring to experience and training here, not “brainpower“. OK, if you wish me to go to schoolyard level, then ASK me about the content of the book in question, and see if I've read the entire thing or not.
Corey123 wrote:
I suppose I am not supposed to take that as an insult too right?
No Corey, it's not intended as an insult. You're not supposed to be able to read an entire book in 1 hour at 17. It comes later on.
Sleekviper wrote:
HA! Thanks Maria, I hope he likes the idea, I shall call it a day if not.
Hey Sleek, I'll call it a night, especially with the vibe and all. ;-) Personally I'm one of those who believe that Stride was an “interrupted“ crime, and mostly due to the poney, not to Diemshitz, but I'll be happy to read your thoughts and a future article on an intended double kill.
Corey123 wrote:
I suppose you had read it in almost an hour, a whole book?
Corey, let's not continue this discussion. In a couple of years you'll be able to read an entire book in an hour too, especially if you're familiar with the subject. A few years (or decades) in college and research does this to you. And never underestimate the importance of indexes for figuring out the thematic percentage of a book and what sources are discussed in there. You'll figure it all out in due time. I promise.
Leave a comment: