Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Dutfields Yard Really Empty?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Mitch writes:

    "Cutting the neck so deeply like the other victims was probably considered work to JTR. "

    This thread is getting stranger by the minute, I have to say! Besides, I do not think that he necessarily cut to bleed the women. My guess is that he wanted to ensure silence by severing the windpipe.

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Comment


    • #32
      Hi Mitch,
      Originally posted by Mitch Rowe View Post
      Because he intended to mutilate them.
      If I read you correctly, Jack decided whether or not to mutilate based on how deeply he'd cut someone's throat?

      If whoever killed Stride didn't cut her neck deeply because he'd decided not to mutilate her, then it doesn't sound much like the man who took things to the Nth degree in Mitre Square shortly afterwards.
      Kind regards, Sam Flynn

      "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
        Mitch writes:

        "Cutting the neck so deeply like the other victims was probably considered work to JTR. "

        This thread is getting stranger by the minute, I have to say! Besides, I do not think that he necessarily cut to bleed the women. My guess is that he wanted to ensure silence by severing the windpipe.

        The best,
        Fisherman
        Well..You know.. If I wanted to ensure silence I would just keep choking/suffocating them!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Mitch Rowe View Post
          Well..You know.. If I wanted to ensure silence I would just keep choking/suffocating them!
          That not only takes time, but also allows the victim more of an opportunity to struggle free.
          Kind regards, Sam Flynn

          "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

          Comment


          • #35
            Hi Fish

            Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
            Me oh my, Observer...!

            That was the kind of question you either answer with + 10 000 signs, or not at all.
            I´ll bow out, if you don´t mind.

            The best,
            Fisherman
            HeHe .....thought that would bring such a reaction.


            Point is Sam what if he was the man who was observed with Stride on and off for an hour and a half, and he took a shine to Long Liz? but he knew he'd have to silence her. Hence the shallower cut to the neck and the lack of mutilation

            all the best

            Observer
            Last edited by Observer; 08-20-2008, 10:22 PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
              Hi Mitch,If I read you correctly, Jack decided whether or not to mutilate based on how deeply he'd cut someone's throat?

              If whoever killed Stride didn't cut her neck deeply because he'd decided not to mutilate her, then it doesn't sound much like the man who took things to the Nth degree in Mitre Square shortly afterwards.
              No..Jack decided how deep to cut the throat based on whether he decided to mutilate!

              It does sound like the same guy. Because he was able to not get caught with Stride. When he aborted his mission Stride was a problem. He wanted to get far away from the problem. JTR is doing alot more than just killing the other victims when he nearly cuts their heads off.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                That not only takes time, but also allows the victim more of an opportunity to struggle free.
                They are passed out! Annie Chapman died of syncope. Phillips said she was partially suffocated. I believe he was right.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Mitch Rowe View Post
                  Phillips said [Chapman] was partially suffocated. I believe he was right.
                  I'm not denying he said that. Whether Jack partially suffocated his victims in every case is a matter of dispute, however - we should be cautious of using it as a distinguishing factor by dint of that controversy. What's undisputed is that the aforementioned victims' throats were more extensively severed than Stride's.
                  Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                  "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                    I'm not denying he said that. Whether Jack partially suffocated his victims in every case is a matter of dispute, however - we should be cautious of using it as a distinguishing factor by dint of that controversy. What's undisputed is that the aforementioned victims' throats were more extensively severed than Stride's.
                    Yes..And if Stride had been mutilated or an attempt had been made then I would say JTR didnt care about draining the blood. What do we have in MJKs case? The blood didnt just happen to drain in the corner of the bed and room. JTR made that happen. It seems like JTR drained her blood. There was a reason beyond killing her that he did that.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Well I'm sorry and maybe it's just me but I am still not getting the whole deepness of the cut issue. Assuming for the sake of argument that Liz was Jack's work,what was his intention? Was it to dispatch her as quickly as possible or to make a cut that was the same depth as all his others. And even if we assume that Jack killed the canonical five, why does one cut that was not as deep as the others cause so much attention? A major league baseball pitcher might throw a 90 mile an hour fastball and then follow it with one that was only 87 miles an hour. Still the same damn pitcher. The focus is also entirely on Jack. But what about Liz? Did she struggle and make it harder for him to cut? Was her clothing exactly like the other victims so that the knife cut would have to be exactly the same? Did Jack have the same angle? Could he see as well in the Yard as he did in the other locations? There are just way too many variables here to place such importance on the depth of the cut. My opinion only.

                      c.d.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by c.d. View Post
                        Well I'm sorry and maybe it's just me but I am still not getting the whole deepness of the cut issue. Assuming for the sake of argument that Liz was Jack's work,what was his intention?
                        ...perhaps to relish the deep slice right around the neck, CD. It strikes me that whoever cut the throats of Nichols, Chapman, etc., did so resolutely and powerfully, cutting deep down into the muscles on the left side of the neck and sliding that baby across the throat to the other side. I suggest that this was part of Jack's "thang", and if so it was a degree removed from the comparatively straightforward throat-wound inflicted on Liz Stride.
                        Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                        "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                          ...perhaps to relish the deep slice right around the neck, CD. It strikes me that whoever cut the throats of Nichols, Chapman, etc., did so resolutely and powerfully, cutting deep down into the muscles on the left side of the neck and sliding that baby across the throat to the other side. I suggest that this was part of Jack's "thang", and if so it was a degree removed from the comparatively straightforward throat-wound inflicted on Liz Stride.
                          Hi Sam,

                          That certainly may be true and if Jack had had his druthers he might have preferred that he had cut Liz in that manner. But it also might have been a case of any port in a storm. Killing being the primary objective. I guess I am simply objecting to the point of view that the neck wound was not as deep, therefore.... I think it is just one of many points to consider and not a point that should be given a lot of weight. Again, my opinion only.

                          c.d.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                            ...perhaps to relish the deep slice right around the neck, CD. It strikes me that whoever cut the throats of Nichols, Chapman, etc., did so resolutely and powerfully, cutting deep down into the muscles on the left side of the neck and sliding that baby across the throat to the other side. I suggest that this was part of Jack's "thang", and if so it was a degree removed from the comparatively straightforward throat-wound inflicted on Liz Stride.
                            Whether it was his "thang" or not is beside the point. If he gets away from the Stride problem he can always do his "thang" somewhere else. Besides who says his "thang" cant serve a purpose?

                            I personally think JTR was just draining the blood and no other purpose. That doesnt mean I dont include it as a signature. It dont have to be a ritual to be a signature with me. I believe a signature is what you do when you do it. The reasons dont matter for that instance. But beyond that.. The reasons can become its own signature.

                            Lets see now? If JTR is draining the blood in order to mutilate. The where does that leave poor Alice McKenzie? Not very likely Im afraid.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Yes, if it was 2.5" deep instead of 3.5" deep, it was still a proper cut.

                              In each murder, you can find several things that are different from all the other slayings.
                              Last edited by sdreid; 08-20-2008, 11:44 PM.
                              This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                              Stan Reid

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by sdreid View Post
                                Yes, if it was 2.5" deep instead of 3.5" deep, it was still a proper cut.

                                In each murder, you can find several things that are different from all the other slayings.
                                Yes. And many of those we can find no reasons. With Stride we can find a reason. Probably aborted his mission when Diemschutz arrived. If so then I think JTR had been in the yard before. If he aborts before Diemschutz then he didnt like the accomidations.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X