"I think I know him"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
    So this killer who had good reason (good enough to kill her), let her stay among the police for several hours, severely intoxicated to the extent where she could have blabbed anything, but only planned to eliminate her after she had spoken to police???

    How can that possibly make sense to anyone?
    Yes, but what if a drunken Eddowes getting picked up by the police was not supposed to happen !!
    The plan may have been to keep buying her drinks (to keep her close) and then slaughter her when darkness falls.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
    .... I suspect a meeting time was prearranged, but whomever was waiting for her knew she was in jail.
    So this killer who had good reason (good enough to kill her), let her stay among the police for several hours, severely intoxicated to the extent where she could have blabbed anything, but only planned to eliminate her after she had spoken to police???

    How can that possibly make sense to anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    What reward!

    Why would Jack have plied her with alcohol?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
    As I pointed out in another thread Sam, the killer didn't need to find this woman who was claiming she knew his name, I suspect she came to him, if vicariously, through his intermediaries.
    There was still precious little time for her to have tracked him, or his associates, down. Besides, if she was so sure of her information, why not go to the police first as last, without risking having her throat cut by this evidently dangerous man by unilaterally meeting with him and provoking his ire with blackmail threats?

    Although there is no guarantee she would be released at a specific time, there was a pretty sure bet she would be set free. That was the city policy.
    But by no means guaranteed, and she could easily have blabbed the killer's name to the police whilst ostensibly banged up for the night, thereby succeeding in her (alleged) intention to claim the reward. Indeed, if her request to be let out was so that she could honour a prearranged meeting with the killer and/or his accomplices, she could even have offered to lead the police to him, thereby GUARANTEEING her release from the cells, and securing the reward in one fell swoop.

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
    Maybe her new jacket was evidence of that wishful thinking.
    New jacket? Don't think I've ever heard of that before. Please fill me in.

    curious

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael W Richards
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    Taken over from a Tabram thread. Did Eddowes make up her story about knowing the killer, or was it made up for her? Here's a starter.

    I still find it difficult to believe that the killer had enough time to track her down, even if her story had spread like wildfire in the ~24h between her allegedly telling her story to the casual ward deputy and her death. There was an even shorter time between her allegedly telling the deputy her story and her apparently being plied with booze by her killer and/or his supposed accomplices. And, if the latter happened, why didn't they just finish her off there and then, without leaving her to be picked up by the police and banged up in the cells for an indeterminate amount of time? There was absolutely no guarantee that she'd be released that night, let alone conveniently in time to meet her killer some 30 minutes later. And, if she had information that would put her in line for the reward, why didn't she tell the police when she had the chance? The answer is almost certainly that she didn't know who the killer was and, I'd contend, that she didn't even think that she did. It's much more likely that the casual ward deputy made the story up, or that a journalist - again, from a single newspaper - invented it himself.
    As I pointed out in another thread Sam, the killer didn't need to find this woman who was claiming she knew his name, I suspect she came to him, if vicariously, through his intermediaries.

    Although there is no guarantee she would be released at a specific time, there was a pretty sure bet she would be set free. That was the city policy at that time, and she wouldn't need an entire night to become sober enough to release. I suspect a meeting time was prearranged, but whomever was waiting for her knew she was in jail. Her hand on Sailor Mans chest seems to me to be some kind of gesture of relief, like she was grateful to the man for waiting. Although I have strong suspicions that Sailor Man is a red herring anyway.

    The Irish component here is what intrigues me.....her dedication to Conway to the extent she has a prominent tattoo, for life, on her forearm. The social interactions she would have had at that time would naturally been with Irish associates of his. And the fact that when she was killed Irish revolutionary doctrines and plots were making headlines at the Parnell Commission hearings. The air was filled with talk of spies and fiends, maybe she knew some. Maybe she knew a cruel one. Maybe she was guessing.

    I think from what Ive read about Kate, she was, perhaps more than most of the others, someone who intended to survive the hardships. Determined. Maybe looking for some way out of the East End. Perhaps that dream led her to believe she could blackmail dangerous people to extort monies that surpassed any reward monies available to her, and leave the ghetto the East End had become. Maybe her new jacket was evidence of that wishful thinking.
    Last edited by Michael W Richards; 12-19-2017, 05:13 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    and, I'd contend, that she didn't even think that she did. .
    There was Edward McKenna.

    The local oddball who had also been hop picking. He was picked up by police and questioned about the murders.

    If her suspect wasn`t him, it could have been someone like that. A nut returning from the hops just as the murders commence.

    Leave a comment:


  • DirectorDave
    replied
    Back then, like now I'm sure everybody had a theory on who the murderer was...some more ridiculous than others.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hunter
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn
    ...The answer is almost certainly that she didn't know who the killer was and, I'd contend, that she didn't even think that she did. It's much more likely that the casual ward deputy made the story up, or that a journalist - again, from a single newspaper - invented it himself.
    Agree, but it doesn't stop people with a vivid imagination from having a go at it.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    I have no reason to doubt she said she knew him (or thoughts she did).

    But either that was just a coincidence it seems many thought they could solve it (not much has changed).

    Or she arranged to meet him to talk it through or bribe him or give him the chance to change her mind, and paid the price

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    started a topic "I think I know him"

    "I think I know him"

    Taken over from a Tabram thread. Did Eddowes make up her story about knowing the killer, or was it made up for her? Here's a starter.
    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
    Sam, I think that I gave you a plausible explanation for what may have occurred had the story by the landlady been accurate.
    I still find it difficult to believe that the killer had enough time to track her down, even if her story had spread like wildfire in the ~24h between her allegedly telling her story to the casual ward deputy and her death. There was an even shorter time between her allegedly telling the deputy her story and her apparently being plied with booze by her killer and/or his supposed accomplices. And, if the latter happened, why didn't they just finish her off there and then, without leaving her to be picked up by the police and banged up in the cells for an indeterminate amount of time? There was absolutely no guarantee that she'd be released that night, let alone conveniently in time to meet her killer some 30 minutes later. And, if she had information that would put her in line for the reward, why didn't she tell the police when she had the chance? The answer is almost certainly that she didn't know who the killer was and, I'd contend, that she didn't even think that she did. It's much more likely that the casual ward deputy made the story up, or that a journalist - again, from a single newspaper - invented it himself.
Working...
X