Jack, Son of Jack

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day MayBea

    Any chance of posting more of that article, in particular the last couple of words caught my attention, about in another room. Does that part relate to MJK or is he moving on to another family/person.

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by MayBea View Post
    Hi Debra,

    This is the article, you will agree, from which George West took his information about Mary Kelly. In it, her child is described as a son of 8.
    http://www.jtrforums.com/showthread.php?t=18036

    If West is describing a child matching the one in the Standard, then the child was born around 1880. West retired to another place in 1882 so the child he knew of, or saw, would be under two years old so it could well have been a girl. Again, we have a possible match.
    Hi MB
    That would mean that The Standard's initial account of the murder of MJK was spot on in it's detail? Which it isn't according to witnesses, Barnett especially. Doesn't George West associate Miller's Court MJK with the Birkenhead MJK because of the specific claims made in the Standard at the break of the story: that Miller's Court MJK lived with her child and her mother?

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    There is this MJK in the criminal records that might be worth further research to see if she corresponds to George West's MJK.
    Hi Debra,

    This is the article, you will agree, from which George West took his information about Mary Kelly. In it, her child is described as a son of 8.
    http://www.jtrforums.com/showthread.php?t=18036

    If West is describing a child matching the one in the Standard, then the child was born around 1880. West retired to another place in 1882 so the child he knew of, or saw, would be under two years old so it could well have been a girl. Again, we have a possible match.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by MayBea; 01-25-2014, 12:19 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Mayerling View Post
    I have to enquire - where did you get the information that the composer Sir Arthur Sullivan was a "famous patron of prostitutes"...In the film "Topsy Turvey" they even discussed how Mrs. Ronald had to get an abortion...
    As I remember, Mayerling, there was a scene in Topsy Turvey of Sullivan in a French brothel. That would have happened in 1884, the same year Mary Kelly allegedly went to France. A connection was made there.

    The Audience Guide for the Skylight Theatre on Broadway describes him thusly:

    He smoked, drank, gambled and was
    somewhat notorious for his voracious
    appetites, including encounters with
    prostitutes and indulging in fine food and
    wine.

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Mayerling View Post
    If there is a connection between the Wilsons, Ryan, and this James Gleeson Gateman, and the fact that Liverpool plays a part in this overall story, the matter may become more interesting than you might think.
    Jack Wilson married into a family of Ryans and Batemans living in London. That was in 1919.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    1891 census Birkenhead,

    John Ryan born abt 1861 London, Surrey, England Visitor Retired Soldier Birkenhead, Cheshire

    Visiting James Gleeson Gateman at Docks... RG12/2886 page 20

    Pat
    If there is a connection between the Wilsons, Ryan, and this James Gleeson Gateman, and the fact that Liverpool plays a part in this overall story, the matter may become more interesting than you might think.

    In 1849 there was a mass murder in Liverpool of a boarding house keeper and her children by one John Gleeson Wilson, who apparently did it to rob the family (he was boarding with them). Wilson may have been insane, but he was tried, found guilty, and executed.

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by MayBea View Post
    Thank you, Bridewell and GUT.


    Might I mention that Jack Wilson was very talented musically. Family claims he could play every instrument by the age of ten, a claim similarly made of Sir Arthur Sullivan.

    The talent and the name change to Arthur Sullivan is what led to earlier suggestions that the father was Sir Arthur Sullivan, famous patron of prostitutes.
    I have to enquire - where did you get the information that the composer Sir Arthur Sullivan was a "famous patron of prostitutes". It's not impossible that he or Gilbert used them, but Sullivan was known for his long and faithful relationship with Mrs. Ronald, the wife of a banker. In the film "Topsy Turvey" they even discussed how Mrs. Ronald had to get an abortion as a result of their daliance.

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Has anyone researched who the woman named Mary Jane Dixon who signed as a witness on one of the family wedding certificates (Was it Christina's? I can't remember offhand).

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    This is the best piece of evidence:

    The marriage certificate proving that Jack's uncle Henry's niece was living on Thrawl St. in 1887.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by MayBea; 01-24-2014, 03:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    There is this MJK in the criminal records that might be worth further research to see if she corresponds to George West's MJK

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    When her mum was in Birkenhead in 1881 with Annie and her dad with Robert and Mary in 1881, were they living apart? Or just visiting?
    The census records the father and the mother as visitors in the respective households.

    The cost of the ferry ride across the Mersey may have been prohibitive, therefore requiring a lengthier stay. Ann was also a recent widow and a new mother and working as a milk dealer.

    1881 Census

    John Dixon 65
    Ann Dixon 68
    Ellen Dixon 14
    Ann A. Dixon 29
    George Dixon 1
    Mary Kelly 60 visitor

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Robert and James...

    Maybea,
    If you have Rose and James Wilson in 1851 and 1861, Rose must be Roberts mother as he and his twin were born in 1852. I looked in both Catholic and ordinary baptisms and christening but found nothing.
    I agree with GUT I expect they meant it was Roberts wife not his mother, thats how I would take it.
    I have checked newspapers and criminal records from 1879 and cant find any related to a Mary Jane Kelly. When her mum was in Birkenhead in 1881 with Annie and her dad with Robert and Mary in 1881, were they living apart? Or just visiting?
    Anyway still looking....

    Pat........................

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Be very careful with other peoples trees on web sites, I've seen some, relating to my own family, that are pure flights of fantasy. I would very much take one reference to Mary Jane Kelly as mother of Mary Anne with a grain of salt, unless it's supported by documentation.

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by MayBea View Post
    It's strange but I found a Family Tree of a descendant of Mary Ann Wilson/Stirrup and, where Rose Wilson should be, it lists Mary Ann's mother as "Mary Jane Kelly".
    Two other trees for the same family leave the mother's name empty as Unknown.

    It seems that James Wilson's wife, Rose, in the 51 and 61 Censuses, is not his first wife, and not the mother of the older children.

    Son, Robert, could then have married a blood, Kelly cousin of his older siblings but not his.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    From Free Bmd

    I think this is probably them will look to see if I can find more

    Pat...................

    Births Jun 1852
    Wilson James Liverpool 8b 9
    Wilson Robert Liverpool 8b 9

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X