Jack, Son of Jack

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paddy
    replied
    Maybea can you give me a link to what Mr West said please?
    Its strange I have a friend whos parents came from Ireland back a bit and she was born in Everton Liverpool name of Wilson. I seem to think her dad was called Isaac. I will give her a ring tomorrow and ask if she knew of this family.
    I take it no one has found Mary Jane Wilson in 1891 census?

    Pat................................

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Yes, Paddy. She would have been 10 months old.

    That's why I think she might be George West's Birkenhead Mary Kelly. He doesn't mention if the child is male or female, perhaps because the child was too young for him to tell the gender.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Christina

    It actually says Christina is 10, so this could have meant to be 10 months old ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    1881 census

    Having found Robert and Mary Wilsons marriage cert that states Marys dad was John Kelly a Joiner.
    They are probably these I think in Liverpool 1881. You may already have them?.....

    RG11/3594 page 47

    Robert Wilson b 1854 Head Liverpool Baker
    Mary b 1855 wife ..
    Robert b 1874 son ..
    Christina b 1871 daughter
    John Kelly b1824 Visitor Ireland Joiner..

    Pat.........................

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Elena

    Some speculate [think] he was related to Mary Jame Kelly, the victim of Jacky.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elenahoyos66
    replied
    So, wait, I'm confused - - are we making the assumption that this man is related to the Mary Jane Kelly?

    Or are we just trying to figure out why this man has changed his name on occasion, and that to the curious, it is a puzzling action?

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Here is a thread identifying a woman matching Mary Kelly's newspaper description and sent in as a tip to the Met by a retired Birkenhead police inspector, George West.
    http://www.jtrforums.com/showthread.php?t=17006

    This "Birkenhead MJK" matches Jack Wilson's mother.

    George West also mentions the woman living with her mother in Birkenhead. This also turned out to match Jack Wilson's mother.

    His grandmother is in Birkenhead with his aunt in 1881.

    * Civil parish: Tranmere
    County/Island: Cheshire
    Street Address: 101 Peel St
    Registration district: Birkenhead

    Household Members: Name Age

    John Dixon 65
    Ann Dixon 68
    Ellen Dixon 14
    Ann A. Dixon 29
    George Dixon 1
    Mary Kelly 60

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by MayBea View Post
    Here is the 1861 Census putting Jack Wilson's uncle's sister-in-law, Angelica Gould, in the residence of a cotton broker. The uncle's name is Henry Kelly, married to Margaret Gould.
    In the course of my research, I asked a living relative of Liverpool cotton broker, Augustus Agelasto, if there were any Ripper tales in his family and he said he hadn't heard of any.

    William John Kelly married the alleged goddaughter of the Earl of Carnarvon. Her family were certainly servants of Carnarvon, based on Census records putting her aunt and uncle, Elizabeth Ryan and Pierre (Fund, sic) Funel, with Lady Carnarvon at Pixton Park in 1891.

    We can believe that Ripper stories were bandied about by the Carnarvons since sources put the Royal Conspiracy originating with one of their relatives, Caroline Acland.
    'The clearest, most accurate, and most up-to-date account of the Ripper murders, by one of Britain's greatest and most respected experts on the "autumn of terror" in Victorian London.' William D. Rubenstein, Professor of Modern History, University of Wales, Aberystwyth England in the 1880s was a society in transition, shedding the skin of Victorianism and moving towards a more modern age. Promiscuity, moral decline, prostitution, unemployment, poverty, police inefficiency... all these things combined to create a feeling of uncertainty and fear. The East End of London became the focus of that fear. Here lived the uneducated, poverty-ridden and morally destitute masses. When Jack the Ripper walked onto the streets of the East End he came to represent everything that was wrong with the area and with society as a whole. He was fear in a human form, an unknown lurker in the shadows who could cross boundaries and kill. Jack the Ripper: The Definitive History is not yet another attempt to identify the culprit. Instead, the book sets the murders in their historical context, examining in depth what East London was like in 1888, how it came to be that way, and how events led to one of the most infamous and grisly episodes of the Victorian era.

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    I ordered a couple of incorrect birth certificates when I was looking for William John Wilson's. They are from London in 1883 and Lancaster in '84 because I thought he might be older and might be born outside of Liverpool. I also found a Liverpool certificate from 1896 on Google images.

    The delays in reporting are 9 days and 42 days and 44 days.

    So it looks like the new parents wait until right up to the legal limit of 42 and go over. Although this is not a representative sample, it looks like you might be right, Penhalion. 54 days might not be significant.

    Leave a comment:


  • Penhalion
    replied
    I don't find the delay in reporting the birth to be significant, even if it went beyond the legal parameters. My father was born at home in 1920 and didn't get a birth certificate until he needed one to start grade school. This wasn't in some small rural town either, he was born and raised in Chicago. If John was born in the home, then they might not have gotten around to registering his birth until quite some time afterwards. An interesting question would be if there are similar delays in reporting which are evident in other children born in that area in the general time frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    No, I never considered Edith Wilson. William only claimed Christina as his sister.

    Christina went into the Fazakerley Cottage Homes in 1890 and then got married in 1899 to Robert Ironside and moved to Scotland.


    You're right about the Salvation Army operating in Liverpool, even in the 1880s. So William could have been referring to the Sally Ann there instead of in Whitechapel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Edith Wilson

    Did you ever consider the Edith Wilson baptised 1888 in Everton st Chrysostom Liverpool, as a sister for your chap?
    She was brought in an baptised by a man called David Ingrams? in 1888
    but her mother and father were called Robert and Mary.
    There was an Edith Wilson in the Ripley Hospital in 1891 census aged 11.
    Did you find what happened to Christina?

    I found the following info on a Ripley Hospital website

    Ripley St Thomas School began life as Ripley Hospital, an endowed school founded by Mrs. Julia Ripley in memory of her husband, Thomas Ripley, who was a native of Lancaster and a merchant of Liverpool. The school buildings and grounds are most attractive, occupying an elevated site giving open views to the City of Lancaster and the Lake District hills beyond. It was opened on the 3 November, 1864 "amid great public rejoicing". Originally endowed for the education of an equal number of boys and girls - altogether 300 in number - the parents of whom had to have lived for at least 2 years immediately preceding the death of the father either within 15 miles of Lancaster Priory, or 7 miles of Liverpool Cathedral.

    I also read that the Salvation Army were active in Liverpool.

    Pat............................

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Sorry scrub round last posting re the Army Arthur Sullivan....
    He is son of Thomas and Alice so definitely not the right one...
    The name change to Arthur Sullivan did not occur until his marriage in London in 1919. He was John Sullivan in WWI fighting with the Royal Warwickshire Regiment.

    He re-enlisted in the Royal Horse and Field Artillery under the name John Wilson sometime prior to going to India where he is found in the 1911 Census.

    If something strange happened to him to make him change his name to Sullivan, it would have happened while in India or upon his return. He was seriously injured but I don't know if that would warrant a name change and a denial of being a Wilson after his retirement as a soldier.

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Robert and Mary married Sept 9th 1872
    witnesses W Cavanagh (signed) andElizabeth Forcroft (mark)
    Marys dad is John a Joiner....
    Pat, this is the correct marriage. Robert is listed as a baker.

    The Robert, baker, you found married to a Mary who gave birth to a John in October 1888 are the wrong ones. They are still on Amos St. with Mary's parents in 1891. Their last name is Matthews, not Kelly. John is missing.

    1891 Census
    Liverpool
    24 Amos St

    Joseph Matthews lorry driver b Ireland
    Mary Matthews wife b Scotland
    Robert Wilson son in law baker b Liverpool
    Mary Wilson wife b Liverpool

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Apologies

    Sorry scrub round last posting re the Army Arthur Sullivan....
    He is son of Thomas and Alice so definitely not the right one

    Pat................................

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X