Jack, Son of Jack

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by MayBea View Post

    Do you think she might be Christina's mother still alive and remarried as a Dixon? I might have to look at Mary Jane Kelly/Wilson marriages to Dixons between 1887 and 1899.
    I did wonder if she could be, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    The article mentions a "Jack" who was a drover, living in McCarthy's any ideas anyone. It says MJK was his mistress.
    I guess it is supposed to be Barnett given the mention of Billingsgate?
    It's a remarkable article-there are no others like it when it comes to describing MJK and her last hours, although some early articles did contain some similar elements- almost all fiction compared to the later witness statements.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Re 1891 census

    I traced this (last posted) 1891 family back and in 1871 they had a son George living with them born 1851 in Tranmere Cheshire. I think this is Annies husband so the little boy William J with them in 1891 is probably your Jack. But Mary H Dixon is not your Mary J as she is in previous earlier census with parents.

    Anne Amelia Kelly (Mary J's sister) married a George Dixon in Birkenhead.
    George died in 1880 Birkenhead (see below from freeBMD)

    Marriages Jun 1877
    Dixon George Birkenhead 8a 686
    KELLY Ann Amelia Birkenhead 8a 686

    Deaths Dec 1880
    Dixon George 29 Birkenhead 8a 305

    Pat.................
    Last edited by Paddy; 01-26-2014, 07:37 PM. Reason: Numpty !

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    The article mentions a "Jack" who was a drover, living in McCarthy's any ideas anyone. It says MJK was his mistress.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Deb

    Thanks for posting the full article, I could find it but not in a format I could read.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Dixons

    Could Annie Amelia Kellys in-law have taken Jack in and been the maiden aunt.
    If you look at RG12/2834 page 26 in the 1891 census in Helsby Cheshire
    There is also a William J Dixon living with them. (Ann Amelia Kellys' husband
    was a Dixon wasn't he?)

    John Dixon 65
    Mary A Dixon 68
    Mary H Dixon 36
    William J Dixon 5

    Pat....................

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    Has anyone researched who the woman named Mary Jane Dixon who signed as a witness on one of the family wedding certificates (Was it Christina's? I can't remember offhand).
    I did look into Mary Jane Dixon to identify her and see if she had any connection to the Birkenhead Dixons or any other connection to the Kellys and Wilsons of Liverpool besides signing as a witness at Christina's wedding, but I couldn't find any connections with the candidates in the Preston area.

    Do you think she might be Christina's mother still alive and remarried as a Dixon? I might have to look at Mary Jane Kelly/Wilson marriages to Dixons between 1887 and 1899.

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    Hi MB
    That would mean that The Standard's initial account of the murder of MJK was spot on in it's detail? Which it isn't according to witnesses, Barnett especially. Doesn't George West associate Miller's Court MJK with the Birkenhead MJK because of the specific claims made in the Standard at the break of the story: that Miller's Court MJK lived with her child and her mother?
    The account of Whitechapel Mary doesn't have to be accurate for West's description of the Mary in Birkenhead to be accurate. It's a fair guess West's description of her is accurate and it does match Jack Wilson's mother, if she did visit with her sister and mother in Birkenhead which is probable.

    Of course, I have to admit I'm trying to link Jack's mother with MJK in London. So there is the problem with the account not seeming to match Jack's mum.

    But couldn't Mary Kelly have had a child who didn't live with her regularly, and couldn't the friends, whom she allowed to stay regularly with her and who were likely older, be mistaken as being her mother?

    Leave a comment:


  • MayBea
    replied
    Originally posted by Mayerling View Post
    Thanks MaeBea for the site - rather interesting one about G & S, or whom I am a fan.
    You're welcome, Mayerling. I'll admit that my description of S as a "famous patron of prostitutes" might be an over-exaggeration. I must defer on that.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by MayBea View Post
    Jack Wilson married into a family of Ryans and Batemans living in London. That was in 1919.
    Could the man who was visited in 1891 been named John Gleeson Bateman instead of Gateman? If so, could he have a connection with Gleeson Wilson?

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by MayBea View Post
    As I remember, Mayerling, there was a scene in Topsy Turvey of Sullivan in a French brothel. That would have happened in 1884, the same year Mary Kelly allegedly went to France. A connection was made there.

    The Audience Guide for the Skylight Theatre on Broadway describes him thusly:

    He smoked, drank, gambled and was
    somewhat notorious for his voracious
    appetites, including encounters with
    prostitutes and indulging in fine food and
    wine.

    http://www.skylightmusictheatre.org/...ud-guide-5.pdf
    Thanks MaeBea for the site - rather interesting one about G & S, or whom I am a fan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    The article referenced by George West

    The Standard Saturday, November 10, 1888

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Stephen

    But how? I can't find a register link anywhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post

    I assume its from the link to JTRforums but it won't let me see it!! Do I need to join to view things?
    Who wouldn't want to join JTRforums?

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Sorry MayBea

    I assume its from the link to JTRforums but it won't let me see it!! Do I need to join to view things?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X