Originally posted by MayBea
View Post
Jack, Son of Jack
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostThe article mentions a "Jack" who was a drover, living in McCarthy's any ideas anyone. It says MJK was his mistress.
It's a remarkable article-there are no others like it when it comes to describing MJK and her last hours, although some early articles did contain some similar elements- almost all fiction compared to the later witness statements.
Leave a comment:
-
Re 1891 census
I traced this (last posted) 1891 family back and in 1871 they had a son George living with them born 1851 in Tranmere Cheshire. I think this is Annies husband so the little boy William J with them in 1891 is probably your Jack. But Mary H Dixon is not your Mary J as she is in previous earlier census with parents.
Anne Amelia Kelly (Mary J's sister) married a George Dixon in Birkenhead.
George died in 1880 Birkenhead (see below from freeBMD)
Marriages Jun 1877
Dixon George Birkenhead 8a 686
KELLY Ann Amelia Birkenhead 8a 686
Deaths Dec 1880
Dixon George 29 Birkenhead 8a 305
Pat.................
Leave a comment:
-
The article mentions a "Jack" who was a drover, living in McCarthy's any ideas anyone. It says MJK was his mistress.
Leave a comment:
-
G'Day Deb
Thanks for posting the full article, I could find it but not in a format I could read.
Leave a comment:
-
Dixons
Could Annie Amelia Kellys in-law have taken Jack in and been the maiden aunt.
If you look at RG12/2834 page 26 in the 1891 census in Helsby Cheshire
There is also a William J Dixon living with them. (Ann Amelia Kellys' husband
was a Dixon wasn't he?)
John Dixon 65
Mary A Dixon 68
Mary H Dixon 36
William J Dixon 5
Pat....................
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Debra A View PostHas anyone researched who the woman named Mary Jane Dixon who signed as a witness on one of the family wedding certificates (Was it Christina's? I can't remember offhand).
Do you think she might be Christina's mother still alive and remarried as a Dixon? I might have to look at Mary Jane Kelly/Wilson marriages to Dixons between 1887 and 1899.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Debra A View PostHi MB
That would mean that The Standard's initial account of the murder of MJK was spot on in it's detail? Which it isn't according to witnesses, Barnett especially. Doesn't George West associate Miller's Court MJK with the Birkenhead MJK because of the specific claims made in the Standard at the break of the story: that Miller's Court MJK lived with her child and her mother?
Of course, I have to admit I'm trying to link Jack's mother with MJK in London. So there is the problem with the account not seeming to match Jack's mum.
But couldn't Mary Kelly have had a child who didn't live with her regularly, and couldn't the friends, whom she allowed to stay regularly with her and who were likely older, be mistaken as being her mother?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mayerling View PostThanks MaeBea for the site - rather interesting one about G & S, or whom I am a fan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MayBea View PostJack Wilson married into a family of Ryans and Batemans living in London. That was in 1919.
Jeff
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MayBea View PostAs I remember, Mayerling, there was a scene in Topsy Turvey of Sullivan in a French brothel. That would have happened in 1884, the same year Mary Kelly allegedly went to France. A connection was made there.
The Audience Guide for the Skylight Theatre on Broadway describes him thusly:
He smoked, drank, gambled and was
somewhat notorious for his voracious
appetites, including encounters with
prostitutes and indulging in fine food and
wine.
http://www.skylightmusictheatre.org/...ud-guide-5.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
The article referenced by George West
The Standard Saturday, November 10, 1888
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GUT View Post
I assume its from the link to JTRforums but it won't let me see it!! Do I need to join to view things?
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry MayBea
I assume its from the link to JTRforums but it won't let me see it!! Do I need to join to view things?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: