Originally posted by Lewis C
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Evidence of innocence
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post
Hi Lewis, I wish I was as sure of winning the Lotto at the weekend as I am of Lechmere's innocence. If he is guilty then it certainly is not for the reasons Christer et al have mentioned because everyone one of their 'red flags' have been severely debunked to the point they are just making up stuff now. I mean they did then but it's got desperate.
I wouldn't have used the Lotto example, because every Ripper suspect is much more likely to be innocent than you are to win the lottery. I think of it this way. Cross can't be proven innocent, it's just that there's almost no good reason to think he's guilty. I'd say there are only 4 people who have been named as Ripper suspects that can be proven innocent: Ostrog, Cream, Van Gogh, and Prince Albert Victor.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geddy2112 View PostThere is of course the Tiger if you listen to Ed, the tiger is vital in proving one's guilt.
"The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren
"Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostTiger?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
The latest defence is a twist on one of the most used defences for guilt. We now have 'Lechmere was found alone with a freshly killed victim.'
Ok fair enough. We obviously have two points of bias here from Team Lechmere -
i) Found alone
ii) Freshly killed
I keep going over and over this statement and try to think of how it came about. However, and this is what I'm suggesting here. Was it more in line with the evidence that Cross 'found' Paul in Bucks Row?
Thoughts?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post
It's one of Ed's House of Tenuous Links videos where, if I remember correctly a tiger escaped in the area when Cross was a kid and this could have influenced him to become Jack The Ripper.
https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/bizarre-animal-facts
Hillarious, same as the idea of Cross as a suspect in the murders." Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
Sherlock Holmes
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post
It's one of Ed's House of Tenuous Links videos where, if I remember correctly a tiger escaped in the area when Cross was a kid and this could have influenced him to become Jack The Ripper.
https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/bizarre-animal-facts
So do we all move on to Bible John, the A6 or the Zodiac?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostTiger?
The Lechmere "tie in" is that 3 decades later Charles Lechmere's children started attending school near the site.
No, you can't make this stuff up. HoL has descended into self-parody."The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren
"Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fiver View Post
In 1857 a tiger escaped from a crate and grabbed a young boy. Charles Jamrach, the owner, managed to free the child.
The Lechmere "tie in" is that 3 decades later Charles Lechmere's children started attending school near the site.
No, you can't make this stuff up. HoL has descended into self-parody.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment