Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charles Cross

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

    I can't find a Calton Road, Mile End on the modern map so must have been demolished or called something else.
    According to an old post by Eduardo, Carlton Road is now Portelet Road, and No. 24 was on the southwest corner of Leatherdale Street.

    The only ordnance map I can find (from 1894/5) shows a small back garden (marked in yellow) and if the line is a dividing fence, it could show where Charlie was standing, with the back corner of the building next door directly behind him on the other side of the fence.

    He would be standing in the upper of the two yellow squares facing north, herringbone cap in hand, perhaps meditating on a life well lived.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	24 Carlton Road.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	178.4 KB
ID:	844056

    Comment


    • #92
      In this photo (auto sharpened in photoshop) the object in his right hand looks very much like a peaked cap. Looking at the height of his hands, it can be seen that his left arm is pointed back, and it appears to me that his hand is behind the alignment of the picket gate. Hard as I try, I can't see a chair.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Cross2.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	80.5 KB
ID:	844064

      Cheers, George



      The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.

      ​Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post
        The only ordnance map I can find (from 1894/5) shows a small back garden (marked in yellow) and if the line is a dividing fence, it could show where Charlie was standing, with the back corner of the building next door directly behind him on the other side of the fence.
        Looking at this again, I don't think it works as described. The railed fence dividing his garden from the next house would mean his back is facing west, and his head east, but then there would need to be a second shorter fence (not shown in the ordnance map) dividing his own garden in half, which is possible if that long house (presumably No. 24 according to Ed) is subdivided. The camera angle would also have to be tilted towards the next house. Of course, who knows how accurate that 1894 map is by 1912, if that is indeed the date of the photo.

        And I still think Eduardo should dig up the old fellow's skeleton and set my mind at ease. There was a condition known as 'pigeon chest' (pectus carinatum) and I still think he doesn't look quite right.
        Last edited by rjpalmer; Today, 03:48 AM.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Mark J D View Post
          Amazing that you can all apparently see the completely invisible, transparent, imaginary chair on his left, but somehow not see the *totally obvious* Loch Ness Monster over to his right...

          Let's focus on that 'chair' again, shall we...?
          Wow... in the original picture shown it looks like a chair. In the slightly enhanced version it's clear it's not a chair but a gate. The cane in the older photo is clearly now a peaked cap. There is still a window, and a fence dividing the properties.

          In GBinOz's further enhancement we can see the 'birth' of the famous... what does Team Lechmere call it? The Stroke Scar or the Defensive Wound Scar... mmm

          So yes apologies for 'having a go and trying to help' the chair has even made it across to the other forum. I did actually 'correct' my mistake before you even bothered to post. Any chance you are going to apologise for trying to frame an innocent man of multiple murders? No doubt will be in the next House of Tenuous Links video, isn't that right Sue?

          Are we sure this photo is actually Charles Cross or is it another falsehood pimped by Stow and Co?
          Last edited by Geddy2112; Today, 08:13 AM.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

            According to an old post by Eduardo, Carlton Road is now Portelet Road, and No. 24 was on the southwest corner of Leatherdale Street.

            The only ordnance map I can find (from 1894/5) shows a small back garden (marked in yellow) and if the line is a dividing fence, it could show where Charlie was standing, with the back corner of the building next door directly behind him on the other side of the fence.

            He would be standing in the upper of the two yellow squares facing north, herringbone cap in hand, perhaps meditating on a life well lived.
            As you have said after this post it does not seem to fit. Unless he is standing outside the front of the house. The houses still standing down the road have the same shape windows. Like I said are we 100% this is actually Lechmere because if Stow told me it was Wednesday I'd check a calendar

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
              In this photo (auto sharpened in photoshop) the object in his right hand looks very much like a peaked cap. Looking at the height of his hands, it can be seen that his left arm is pointed back, and it appears to me that his hand is behind the alignment of the picket gate. Hard as I try, I can't see a chair.
              Awesome, thank you. No chair, error on my behalf which I subsequently apologised for. Can you zoom in and tell us what his medal/badge is?

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                Perhaps the mistake is worse than ‘accidentally’ leaving the word ‘about’ out of a book. Or ‘accidentally’ leaving the word ‘about’ out of a documentary. Or ‘accidentally’ forgetting to mention this to a Barrister?
                Or thinking the Coroner is a liar, or thinking one witness trumps three PCs about timings, or thinking an escaped tiger made him do it, or thinking Nichola Bulley is a reason, or thinking it was the Bagels, or thinking there will still be flesh in the Doveton St drains, or thinking Robert Paul could not casually walk 300 yards in under 15 mins, or thinking people who knew each other in real life get buried next to each other when they die... etc

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

                  Can you zoom in and tell us what his medal/badge is?
                  In this photo of Deeming, taken in the mid 1880s, it looks like he is wearing an identical suit, including the medal/badge. Someone suggested earlier that it may be a badge for the Serial Killers Club?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	Deeming2.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	245.1 KB
ID:	844078
                  The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.

                  ​Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                    Looking at this again, I don't think it works as described. The railed fence dividing his garden from the next house would mean his back is facing west, and his head east, but then there would need to be a second shorter fence (not shown in the ordnance map) dividing his own garden in half, which is possible if that long house (presumably No. 24 according to Ed) is subdivided. The camera angle would also have to be tilted towards the next house. Of course, who knows how accurate that 1894 map is by 1912, if that is indeed the date of the photo.

                    And I still think Eduardo should dig up the old fellow's skeleton and set my mind at ease. There was a condition known as 'pigeon chest' (pectus carinatum) and I still think he doesn't look quite right.
                    Hi Roger,

                    I believe that my Dad ‘pigeon chest’ in his later years because he had been suffering from emphysema for many years.
                    Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; Today, 10:52 AM.
                    Regards

                    Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                    “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
                      In this photo (auto sharpened in photoshop) the object in his right hand looks very much like a peaked cap. Looking at the height of his hands, it can be seen that his left arm is pointed back, and it appears to me that his hand is behind the alignment of the picket gate. Hard as I try, I can't see a chair.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Cross2.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	80.5 KB
ID:	844064

                      Cheers, George


                      What a difference George. It certainly looked like he was leaning on a chair before this but we can now say for certain that he is leaning on a fence and I’m as sure as I can be that he does indeed have his cap in his right hand, which I’d have never guessed. I will defend one original suggestion though. I believed that there was a fence directly behind him, that he was almost touching with his back, but now that we can see the gate I can still see what looks like a fence but it’s in the distance (a few feet behind him) Over his right shoulder it looks like a window to me, which is at the other side of the fence…so I’d suggest that the window was next door.

                      Could this photo have been either, a) Cross standing at his back gate with the fence behind him separating his and his neighbours house, or b) could the gate separate two parts of his own garden? A friend of mine has such a gate separating the an area with two lawns and a fish pond and an area at the rear of the garden with a greenhouse where she grows things and her husband has a shed filled with junk that he won’t get rid of. Her gateway is even overgrown with leaves like the one in the photo.

                      Just a couple of possibles.
                      Regards

                      Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                      “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X