I think Major Smith of the City Police was aware of the ID and probably sanctioned it, but reluctantly. He interviewed the witness before the ID "parade" to see if any meaningful result would transpire, but the witness told Smith he wouldn't be able to recognize the suspect again. Smith, under pressure from the MET, let it happen anyway.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Kosminski still the best suspect we have?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostAll the dirty business of Shawlgate aside, is Aaron Kosminski still the most compelling Ripper suspect based on all the known facts of the case?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fanatic View Post
Maybrick HAS to be number One in the suspect list but I think Kosminski should be in the top 10 most likely
Maybrick was ... Well, without the diary, nothing at all. Every bit of the "stacks" of evidence comes from the diary.
Kosminski is an unlikely candidate, but he is at least a candidate.Thems the Vagaries.....
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes View Post
Well... Kosminski lived in the area. He had mental health issues and had been aggressive towards his sister. That's about it really.
Maybrick was ... Well, without the diary, nothing at all. Every bit of the "stacks" of evidence comes from the diary.
Kosminski is an unlikely candidate, but he is at least a candidate.
well he is the only suspect that has a shred of evidence against him, the possible positive id, so theres that."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Has there been any further developments in assessing the marginalia, in particular has anything come to light that reasonably diminishes its credibility?
Comment
-
I was always intrigued by a line from Anderson which went something like: "I am tempted to disclose the identity.........but no public good would come from it".
Public good would have been derived from disclosing the name, given it would have demonstrated the police were/are capable of tracking down murderers which of course is more than useful to the public.
I wonder why: 'no public good from come it' meant it wasn't a good idea to disclose the identity of the murderer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View PostI was always intrigued by a line from Anderson which went something like: "I am tempted to disclose the identity.........but no public good would come from it".
Public good would have been derived from disclosing the name, given it would have demonstrated the police were/are capable of tracking down murderers which of course is more than useful to the public.
I wonder why: 'no public good from come it' meant it wasn't a good idea to disclose the identity of the murderer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Filby View Post
My interpretation was that he believed violating police ethics by naming a suspect based on moral evidence was not worth it - although he was fairly certain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View PostWhen was Kosminski the best suspect in the first place?
However, he is a named suspect who official sources tell us was positively identified but escaped justice on a technicality.
We can question the validity of those claims and Kosminski's suitability, but we can't say this about any other suspect.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Filby View Post
My interpretation was that he believed violating police ethics by naming a suspect based on moral evidence was not worth it - although he was fairly certain.
Anderson was quite happy to disclose that the murderer was 'a low class Polish Jew'.
I think that is bad manners and certainly not in the public interest given that no one had been convicted. We didn't have the same issues with anti-Semitism that they did in continental Europe, but we did have a very small minority capable of getting a mob together underpinned by racial prejudice, e.g. Mosley and associates. It wouldn't be in the interests of public harmony to declare the murderer was a 'low class Polish Jew' (assuming Anderson had in mind 'the public interest' when making his claim).
So, it is not clear to me why Anderson didn't go the whole hog and disclose the name. 'Not being in the public interest' doesn't stack up at this juncture.
On the police ethics point, I think it would be violating police ethics to disclose 'a low class Polish Jew' when no such man had his day in a court of law.
Comment
-
Only Mary Ann Cox got a good look at the suspect,with Blotchy.Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced,it started civil society).
M. Pacana
Comment
Comment