Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Kosminski still the best suspect we have?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Baron
    replied
    "Yes,' said Mr. Abberline, "I know all about that story. But what does it amount to? Simply this. Soon after the last murder in Whitechapel the body of a young doctor was found in the Thames, but there is absolutely nothing beyond the fact that he was found at that time to incriminate him. A report was made to the Home Office about the matter, but that it was 'considered final and conclusive' is going altogether beyond the truth."



    There is absolutely nothing!


    And yet you find a few people after some 130 years from the crimes, who know better about the case than Abberline ever did, to say Druitt is the best suspect that we have!!!


    Its amazing, the possibilities and devesities of human brain are unlimited.


    Druitt was just an arbitrary name picked to fit a theory of a lonely man.



    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    All you do is parrot the same old, tiresome, biased nonsense then you complain when everyone doesn’t agree with you just because you repeat it so often. You could ‘explain’ it a million times and you’d still be 100% wrong.

    Ill tell you who isn’t a good suspect Trevor……a man who can’t even be shown to have been in the same bloody country as the victims when they met their deaths. Try taking off the blinkers and accepting that bit of ‘unsafeness.’

    Can you prove he was not in the country when the murders took place

    This tiresome nonsense you keep referring to are facts which collectivley make the MM unsafe, facts that you wont accpet as being factually correct it is you that needs to take the blinkers off not me.

    You yell me where I am wrong with what I have posted and I have re posted these facts again !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Isnt it a fact that there is no corroboration to the entry regarding Druitt in the memo, and nothing in any other police files to make him a suspect, In fact I belive Abberline did rule him out but I cant find that newspaper report

    So what we have is a document penned by MM setting out his own personal belief as to who the killer was based on what would appear to be nothing more than hearsay as far as Druitt is concerned.

    If Kosminski was such a prime suspect in the first edition of the memo then why is his full name not disclosed
    But in the second edition his full name is still not disclosed but wait MM then exonarates the Kosminki mentioned in the first edition

    Further more staying with Kosminski if we are to believe the Swanson marginalia, this man Kosminski is still a suspect and is purportedy identified in what can only be described as a Mythical ID parade.

    Now given MM was Swansons immediate superior in neither of the editions of the Memo does he mention this ID parade and the identification of Kosminski an important part that many researchers seek to heavily rely on in propping up Kosminski as a suspect.

    If this ID parade had have taken place the word of its outcome would have spread like wildfire around Scotland Yard,Yet we do not see anyone else other than Anderson who makes a vague reference to an identification

    So what are we left with two unsafe editions of the MM
    A question mark surrounding the Mythical ID parade
    And a person of interest with a surname of Kosminki who may not even have been Aaron Kosminski
    And no primary evidnce to support Druitt as being JTR


    The old accepted facts are creaking near to breaking point and you clearly have no answers.

    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
    Last edited by Trevor Marriott; 07-22-2021, 06:57 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Nor a bad one, just an arbitrary name picked up to fit a theory



    The Baron
    Sheesh

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    I’m off to bed before I get a headache from bandying words with Dumb And Dumber.

    Leave a comment:


  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post

    By the charitable organisation, are you referring to Toynbee Hall?

    Although it wouldn't mean that he was JTR, I've often thought that if it could be confirmed that Druitt had volunteered there like many of his peers, it would at least place him in Whitechapel and potentially give him a good working knowledge of the streets.

    That would put him ahead of Koz by a nose in my book.
    Almost, except Koz was substantiated by others later on. Still puts him a bit ahead in my book.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    He was busy taking photos and approaching the press.

    The wrong man in the wrong place.

    He was carelessly accusing people without doing the slightest of investigation, and gave up to his armchair and the lazy afternoon



    The Baron
    Taking photos……what are you wittering on about? I know that your excited to have your partner in slime back with with you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    Telling someone and having the evidence to back it up are two different things. He had all those years to back it up and what was there nothing, zero, zilch

    Druitt was in England.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Nor a bad one, just an arbitrary name picked up to fit a theory



    The Baron
    Rubbish……exactly the kind of thing I’d expect to hear from you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    and how many time does it need explaining to you why the MM is unsafe, Take the blinkers off. Druitt is not even a good suspect

    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
    All you do is parrot the same old, tiresome, biased nonsense then you complain when everyone doesn’t agree with you just because you repeat it so often. You could ‘explain’ it a million times and you’d still be 100% wrong.

    Ill tell you who isn’t a good suspect Trevor……a man who can’t even be shown to have been in the same bloody country as the victims when they met their deaths. Try taking off the blinkers and accepting that bit of ‘unsafeness.’

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    Druitt is not even a good suspect

    Nor a bad one, just an arbitrary name picked up to fit a theory



    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    He had all those years to back it up and what was there nothing, zero, zilch

    He was busy taking photos and approaching the press.

    The wrong man in the wrong place.

    He was carelessly accusing people without doing the slightest of investigation, and gave up to his armchair and the lazy afternoon



    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    When Mac retired in 1913 he told those present at the gathering that he knew the identity of the ripper and that he’d committed suicide. So 19 years after the memorandum he goes for Druitt without mentioning his name. It can be no one else though.
    Telling someone and having the evidence to back it up are two different things. He had all those years to back it up and what was there nothing, zero, zilch


    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    When Mac retired in 1913 he told those present at the gathering that he knew the identity of the ripper and that he’d committed suicide. So 19 years after the memorandum he goes for Druitt without mentioning his name. It can be no one else though.
    and how many time does it need explaining to you why the MM is unsafe, Take the blinkers off. Druitt is not even a good suspect

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Pointless post, it means nothing.

    Even Macnaghten's own daughter didn't believe him or his fantasy theory.



    The Baron
    Your opinion is worthy of being ignored.

    Where did MacNaghten’s daughter say that she didn’t believe him?

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Nelson
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
    Past authors of the Druitt theory have investigated this apparent contradiction, which according to psychologists is precisely what we would expect. Schizophrenia or Bi-polar patients quite regularly switch personality as if their other half didn't exist, in the eyes of the outsider.
    The same could be speculated of Kosminski.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X