thought experiment
Collapse
X
-
Agreed, looks alot like a junior surgeon with delusions of granduer to me.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post... his "technique" seem to vary from murder to murder, Dave, that's for sure. This strongly suggests, not a learned skill, but a rookie experimenting with different approaches.
Leave a comment:
-
To be sure, those were variables. It is a drawback to my approach that it remains so unvarifiable. It could also be that as he aged , younger women fit the targeted image in his mind.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post... not to mention manners, social status and physical appearance
Leave a comment:
-
Agreed. He has definately changed the way it is expressed. But misanthropic people in general do not age discriminate. It could also be that he has passed through his mature fetish stage and is now more interested in contempories and younger. I believe age was in his variable portion of his fantasy.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostIf so, then the misogyny he allegedly exhibits in 1888 is channeled rather differently 9 years later. During that time he switches from primarily wasted middle-aged women to rather attractive younger ones.
Leave a comment:
-
If so, then the misogyny he allegedly exhibits in 1888 is channeled rather differently 9 years later. During that time he switches from primarily wasted middle-aged women to rather attractive younger ones.Originally posted by protohistorian View PostI think somewhere in his make up there is a strong current of misogyny, targeted mostly severly at older (older than he) women.
Leave a comment:
-
I think somewhere in his make up there is a strong current of misogyny, targeted mostly severly at older (older than he) women.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostI might incline to agree with you there, Dave. However, whilst such a person might feel inclined to discreetly dispose of young, attractive women (ostensibly to make way for another young, attractive woman), I'd struggle to square such narcissism with the violent disembowelment of grubby, drunken forty-somethings in the open streets.
As to Kelly - he'd surely have been more inclined to date her, than to have torn her to bits? After all, his dealings with women were distinctly of the amorous kind - at least until he got fed up with them.
Leave a comment:
-
I might incline to agree with you there, Dave. However, whilst such a person might feel inclined to discreetly dispose of young, attractive women (ostensibly to make way for another young, attractive woman), I'd struggle to square such narcissism with the violent disembowelment of grubby, drunken forty-somethings in the open streets.Originally posted by protohistorian View PostI think chapman was a malignant narcissist, (a greatly exagerated self esteem) with delusions of granduer.
As to Kelly - he'd surely have been more inclined to date her, than to have torn her to bits? After all, his dealings with women were distinctly of the amorous kind - at least until he got fed up with them.
Leave a comment:
-
If I am right all those features are fronts. I think chapman was a malignant narcissist, (a greatly exagerated self esteem) with delusions of granduer. When he failed at achieving one of those delusions ( being a surgeon) it left a profoundly deep psychological scar on him. In his own mind,he was a failure. At some point in his mind, he shifted guilt from himself to women, and began attacks. Once he knew he could experiment, he did.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostHi Dave,This didn't stop Klosowski from announcing himself as a mere "feldscher" to friends and family - this, despite his evident propensity to be something of a "Captain Bull$hit" in so many other ways. He seems to have had a good enough time in being a hairdresser and publican anyway: the womanizing, the boat, the American memorabilia, the la-di-da clothes, the self-confidence...
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Dave,This didn't stop Klosowski from announcing himself as a mere "feldscher" to friends and family - this, despite his evident propensity to be something of a "Captain Bull$hit" in so many other ways. He seems to have had a good enough time in being a hairdresser and publican anyway: the womanizing, the boat, the American memorabilia, the la-di-da clothes, the self-confidence...Originally posted by protohistorian View PostI believe that after his apprenticeship, Chapman felt deep disappointment - possibly by the realization he was never going to be a Dr.
Leave a comment:
-
Agreed not a learned skill, but I think he knew enough to formulate a methodology he thought would work. I can see chapman thinking, " how hard can it be"Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post... his "technique" seem to vary from murder to murder, Dave, that's for sure. This strongly suggests, not a learned skill, but a rookie experimenting with different approaches.
Leave a comment:
-
O.K. here's the thing, I am NOT a fan of Gordon, but I do believe the pathology of Chapman fits. I believe that after his apprenticeship, Chapman felt deep disappointment (possibly by the realization he was never going to be a Dr. ) and began in his own mind to see himself as wronged because he felt himself capable of being a surgeon. This belief, with the realization that he could kill and get away with it, lead him to experiment as best he could and "practice" on easy prey. It's a thought anyhowOriginally posted by Sam Flynn View PostUnfortunately, Jack also cut through Annie Chapman's colon - something that's often overlooked, or perhaps more accurately "eclipsed", in favour of more sensational sound-bites from Dr Phillips et al.
(Heaven knows what havoc he inflicted on Nichols' innards, by the way. What descriptions we have are pretty ropy even in terms of her more superficial wounds.)
Leave a comment:
-
... his "technique" seem to vary from murder to murder, Dave, that's for sure. This strongly suggests, not a learned skill, but a rookie experimenting with different approaches.
Leave a comment:
-
looking at the wound patterns as described, I get the impression he is experimenting in a method that he feels is informative.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostUnfortunately, Jack also cut through Annie Chapman's colon - something that's often overlooked, or perhaps more accurately "eclipsed", in favour of more sensational sound-bites from Dr Phillips et al.
(Heaven knows what havoc he inflicted on Nichols' innards, by the way. What descriptions we have are pretty ropy even in terms of her more superficial wounds.)
Leave a comment:
-
Unfortunately, Jack also cut through Annie Chapman's colon - something that's often overlooked, or perhaps more accurately "eclipsed", in favour of more sensational sound-bites from Dr Phillips et al.Originally posted by protohistorian View PostI am no expert but I think you would have to know where and how deep to cut to avoid damaging the cervix uteri. c.f. Annie Chapman
(Heaven knows what havoc he inflicted on Nichols' innards, by the way. What descriptions we have are pretty ropy even in terms of her more superficial wounds.)
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: