Originally posted by Sam Flynn
View Post
What this does is question the idea that you were able to get your meal wrapped up as nicely as you have had it in modern times. If that were the case then there would be no need for plates. Obviously, the conclusion here is that plates were preferable to whatever they were giving food out in. Meaning can't be as good as you had it.
If you want to buy fish and chips (dressed in your astrakhan coat with gold watch and horseshoe tiepin, naturally) you might take a plate.
or possibly your own paper (why, I don't know),
but you don't take a sheet of oilcloth and,
regardless of what the food is wrapped in, you don't secure it with a strap. The idea is ridiculous.
Also cold foods such as deserts can also be wrapped and carried this way.
No barrier at all.
Comment