I think I have found him.

[Mayerling]

Figured 5 to 7 years would see the project start principal photography

That's life.

Still researching. Not completely happy with everything yet.
Some of the gaps will be used constructively
Have most of it firmly nailed.

Picked up on two of my major mistakes since joining.
Geographical.

Confidentiality is damn important.

Writers think it's a horror story.

I have noted on the International Movie Data base (IMDb) website that you can sometimes have to use over ten writers on a screenplay. If you are trying to get the idea written down in a screenplay, best wishes for you.

On the other hand there have been a glut of Ripper films on the screen in recent years - the film producers may be gun-shy as a result about another one.

"Writers think it's a horror story." After looking at all those morgue shots and the two of Mary Kelly you don't see this as a horror story? A light hearted comedy then, like "Kind Hearts and Coronets"?

That's it - the Ripper was Dennis Price (or Louis Mazzini - D'Ascoygne)!!

Jeff

[DJA]

Sure, an 8 year search seems a bit excessive and when a draft that totally satisfies is completed I worry the search for the right everything else will be on going long after I, and most of the posters here, become just dust it the wind.

Figured 5 to 7 years would see the project start principal photography

That's life.

Still researching. Not completely happy with everything yet.
Some of the gaps will be used constructively
Have most of it firmly nailed.

Picked up on two of my major mistakes since joining.
Geographical.

When you think about it,this is not an easy concept to market.

Confidentiality is damn important.

Ripperologists reckon it's impossible.

Writers think it's a horror story.

Meh.

Happy with the Dorset Street lamp but

[Shaggyrand]

So you have no ability to write a manuscript yourself? Do you need a pencil? Or a fundraiser for one?

In fact, wouldn't you like to attend basic English classes first, in order to know how to write a coherent sentence?


Start with tiny steps first, then you can ditch your fantasies.

Hold on now. A screenplay is a different beast and someone making a vanity project who realizes that they aren't the person to script it deserves some credit. I've seen many written and produced by people who couldn't string together a complete sentence if their mother's life depended on it.
Sure, an 8 year search seems a bit excessive and when a draft that totally satisfies is completed I worry the search for the right everything else will be on going long after I, and most of the posters here, become just dust it the wind.

[Brenda]

.

Maybe we should all start our own personal "No, I think I am the one that has found him" threads?

[EmaEm]

If you read the correct newspaper article and know which numbers contained the different types of accommodation,the light was a minimum of three doors away.

You have butted into a friendly joke.

You are now being absolutely ridiculous. You are quoting a newspaper article as proof? Ha, ha, you are just another dreamer who has nothing. Just like Pierre...... furthermore, you have no ability to write your own manuscript, that is obvious. I am so done with you.

[EmaEm]

So you have no ability to write a manuscript yourself? Do you need a pencil? Or a fundraiser for one?

In fact, wouldn't you like to attend basic English classes first, in order to know how to write a coherent sentence?


Start with tiny steps first, then you can ditch your fantasies.

[DJA]

I, for one, can not wait to trash your suspect AND the technical merits of your movie.

Have fun.

Spent over 8 years seeking a suitable screenwriter.

Aiming for an Academy Award for best original.

Film gets done right or not at all.

Stuff the studios.

[DJA]

There is absolutely no way to prove how much lighting there was (and what anyone said) unless you were there.

If you read the correct newspaper article and know which numbers contained the different types of accommodation,the light was a minimum of three doors away.

You have butted into a friendly joke.

[Shaggyrand]

Honestly,ya gonna have to wait for the movie.

Circumstantial evidence will outweigh any need for DNA.

I, for one, can not wait to trash your suspect AND the technical merits of your movie.

[EmaEm]

Honestly,ya gonna have to wait for the movie.

Circumstantial evidence will outweigh any need for DNA.

Circumstantial evidence? From 1888? Are you trying to be funny? In fact are you even au fait with basic law?

[EmaEm]

You ain't seen the facts.

You are still convinced a gas lamp three doors down from Miller's Court would light the entrance

So which one do you prefer......the one in jail,in America,Scotland,hospital,etc.

They are just pathetic jokes.

Cross/Lechmere....crikey,what a laugh.

There is absolutely no way to prove how much lighting there was (and what anyone said) unless you were there.

Are you a time traveller?

[EmaEm]

The scientist is on record stating that he told the author and publisher quite clearly that Mtrdna could not be pinpointed to one person. They both ignored him. Further discovered miscalculations in the mtrdna just tweak the percentages and are not that relevant. Even if they could have found Kosminski's nuclear dna on the shawl it proves nothing. Not even that he was just a client. It certainly does not prove he was a murderer or even JtR.

[DJA]

Well, who is it then? With respect how can you prove it without dna evidence which will never be available?

Honestly,ya gonna have to wait for the movie.

Circumstantial evidence will outweigh any need for DNA.

[EmaEm]

I've known who Jack the Ripper was for over 8 years.

Truth is,the arrogant "know it alls" are not interested.

For the moment two well known members of this and another site have the information in front of them.

There is no major part of the case that I cannot link this guy to.

Everything fits.

I can assure you that Pierre is wrong.

That basket case is closed.

Well, who is it then? With respect how can you prove it without dna evidence which will never be available?

[DJA]

Don't you think it's fair to say that everyone who has a preferred suspect feels just as convinced as you do?

You can't all be right.

You ain't seen the facts.

You are still convinced a gas lamp three doors down from Miller's Court would light the entrance

So which one do you prefer......the one in jail,in America,Scotland,hospital,etc.

They are just pathetic jokes.

Cross/Lechmere....crikey,what a laugh.