Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I think I have found him.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elamarna
    replied
    Abby,

    The only viable reasons are
    1. Research not concluded, I get the feeling this is not the reason.
    2. Comercial concerns.


    I always believed the point of research was to reveal the truth .
    We will just have to wait.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Abby,
    for those of us not in on the secret I guess the question is :

    Is Grampton a person, a place or a group of people.

    We can only wait and see I fear
    Hi El
    I just googled Grampton and all I got was this stupid thread. LOL!

    But im sure we probably wont have to wait too long now that the cat is out of the bag.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Brenda,
    It's more of a farce at the moment.

    Let me propose the following :

    A new therory/solution is in the pipework. I assume for commercial reasons this is not to be common knowledge. Unfortunately it has leaked to some.
    One person has posted under an assumed name he has a theory.
    Now he says he will reveal in sept/oct 2016.
    And from comments made today it seems this other solution is due to be made public around same time.
    I would guess that those in the know think they know who Pierre is.
    This is the problem with secrets ; once it is shared it is no longer a secret!
    I would not be surprised if we get some details much sooner than we are being told.
    If this solution is so big and so ground shattering there is no way people can keep quite for up to 10 or 11 months.
    We may not get much in the way of details but pretty sure we will get a lille, people will keep on asking one way or another

    Regards
    agree Brenda
    why try to keep something apparently so big so quiet for so long? Its only opening up the likelihood that someone will beat you to the punch or steal your thunder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Abby,
    for those of us not in on the secret I guess the question is :

    Is Grampton a person, a place or a group of people.

    We can only wait and see I fear

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    To my fellow gramptonologists

    Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
    It's going to be big Tom it's also going to prove a lot of people wrong I'm just a bit upset that Pierre has obviously been tipped of. I wasn't going to post about it but I don't want Pierre to steal my thunder.
    Pierre doesn't have all the pieces. Let's keep it that way, if you catch my drift. Where grampton is concerned, mums the word. Everybody write that five times or as many times as it takes to sink in.

    Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
    Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
    Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
    Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
    Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Brenda,
    It's more of a farce at the moment.

    Let me propose the following :

    A new therory/solution is in the pipework. I assume for commercial reasons this is not to be common knowledge. Unfortunately it has leaked to some.
    One person has posted under an assumed name he has a theory.
    Now he says he will reveal in sept/oct 2016.
    And from comments made today it seems this other solution is due to be made public around same time.
    I would guess that those in the know think they know who Pierre is.
    This is the problem with secrets ; once it is shared it is no longer a secret!
    I would not be surprised if we get some details much sooner than we are being told.
    If this solution is so big and so ground shattering there is no way people can keep quite for up to 10 or 11 months.
    We may not get much in the way of details but pretty sure we will get a lille, people will keep on asking one way or another

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
    It's going to be big Tom it's also going to prove a lot of people wrong I'm just a bit upset that Pierre has obviously been tipped of. I wasn't going to post about it but I don't want Pierre to steal my thunder.
    So Pierre's suspect is Grampton??

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied
    .

    I'm so frustrated right now. It's like a circus.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardnunweek
    replied
    Hi.
    Its to early for April 1st.?
    So we have a hidden theory on the Horizon, only known by a selected few, something that will outshine, all the suspects previously, it will be so big, it will finally name the killer, it will be DNA proven..and Case closed...
    Worth waiting for ..Yippee.
    Regards Richard.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Pink brought up grampton. Big mistake if you ask me. It's too big. It's just too big.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott
    It's going to be big Tom it's also going to prove a lot of people wrong I'm just a bit upset that Pierre has obviously been tipped of. I wasn't going to post about it but I don't want Pierre to steal my thunder.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by Amanda View Post
    Pinkmoon,

    I didn't think the 'Grampton theory' was going to be revealed until 2016, I'd heard a rumour of a 'Ripper Conference' exclusive.
    Do you know something more? Will there be a publication soon?

    And Pierre, if you don't know about it, why are you still posting when these new revelations will make anything you find look trivial?

    Amanda
    It looks like it will be released onto the general public sometime next year I think I've got myself into a bit of trouble with my associates by posting about grampton on here but if you've heard about it at the conference then someone has not kept their vow of silence I'm sure Pierre must have been tipped of I hope it dosnt spoil the party.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Hi Pierre
    Could you(or anyone else if they want) list all the hints (for lack of a better word) you have given so far in one post for us?

    Thanks in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    DJA
    I fully understand YOUR POSITION,
    you however did not come here claiming you had found him.

    I await your final release with interest.

    however this Grampton thing seems ti be hinting at around same date as Pierre, is it real, i mean does it exist, not is it the answer.

    do you know about it at all? is it just a wind up at pierre?
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Pink brought up grampton. Big mistake if you ask me. It's too big. It's just too big.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Panderoona
    replied
    Im gutted the Grampton things been brought up here, I thought it was only Tom Pink and I knew about it

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X