Abby,
The only viable reasons are
1. Research not concluded, I get the feeling this is not the reason.
2. Comercial concerns.
I always believed the point of research was to reveal the truth .
We will just have to wait.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I think I have found him.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostAbby,
for those of us not in on the secret I guess the question is :
Is Grampton a person, a place or a group of people.
We can only wait and see I fear
I just googled Grampton and all I got was this stupid thread. LOL!
But im sure we probably wont have to wait too long now that the cat is out of the bag.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostBrenda,
It's more of a farce at the moment.
Let me propose the following :
A new therory/solution is in the pipework. I assume for commercial reasons this is not to be common knowledge. Unfortunately it has leaked to some.
One person has posted under an assumed name he has a theory.
Now he says he will reveal in sept/oct 2016.
And from comments made today it seems this other solution is due to be made public around same time.
I would guess that those in the know think they know who Pierre is.
This is the problem with secrets ; once it is shared it is no longer a secret!
I would not be surprised if we get some details much sooner than we are being told.
If this solution is so big and so ground shattering there is no way people can keep quite for up to 10 or 11 months.
We may not get much in the way of details but pretty sure we will get a lille, people will keep on asking one way or another
Regards
why try to keep something apparently so big so quiet for so long? Its only opening up the likelihood that someone will beat you to the punch or steal your thunder.
Leave a comment:
-
Abby,
for those of us not in on the secret I guess the question is :
Is Grampton a person, a place or a group of people.
We can only wait and see I fear
Leave a comment:
-
To my fellow gramptonologists
Originally posted by pinkmoon View PostIt's going to be big Tom it's also going to prove a lot of people wrong I'm just a bit upset that Pierre has obviously been tipped of. I wasn't going to post about it but I don't want Pierre to steal my thunder.
Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
Where grampton is concerned, mums the word.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Leave a comment:
-
Brenda,
It's more of a farce at the moment.
Let me propose the following :
A new therory/solution is in the pipework. I assume for commercial reasons this is not to be common knowledge. Unfortunately it has leaked to some.
One person has posted under an assumed name he has a theory.
Now he says he will reveal in sept/oct 2016.
And from comments made today it seems this other solution is due to be made public around same time.
I would guess that those in the know think they know who Pierre is.
This is the problem with secrets ; once it is shared it is no longer a secret!
I would not be surprised if we get some details much sooner than we are being told.
If this solution is so big and so ground shattering there is no way people can keep quite for up to 10 or 11 months.
We may not get much in the way of details but pretty sure we will get a lille, people will keep on asking one way or another
Regards
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pinkmoon View PostIt's going to be big Tom it's also going to prove a lot of people wrong I'm just a bit upset that Pierre has obviously been tipped of. I wasn't going to post about it but I don't want Pierre to steal my thunder.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi.
Its to early for April 1st.?
So we have a hidden theory on the Horizon, only known by a selected few, something that will outshine, all the suspects previously, it will be so big, it will finally name the killer, it will be DNA proven..and Case closed...
Worth waiting for ..Yippee.
Regards Richard.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostPink brought up grampton. Big mistake if you ask me. It's too big. It's just too big.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Amanda View PostPinkmoon,
I didn't think the 'Grampton theory' was going to be revealed until 2016, I'd heard a rumour of a 'Ripper Conference' exclusive.
Do you know something more? Will there be a publication soon?
And Pierre, if you don't know about it, why are you still posting when these new revelations will make anything you find look trivial?
Amanda
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Pierre
Could you(or anyone else if they want) list all the hints (for lack of a better word) you have given so far in one post for us?
Thanks in advance!
Leave a comment:
-
DJA
I fully understand YOUR POSITION,
you however did not come here claiming you had found him.
I await your final release with interest.
however this Grampton thing seems ti be hinting at around same date as Pierre, is it real, i mean does it exist, not is it the answer.
do you know about it at all? is it just a wind up at pierre?
regards
Leave a comment:
-
Pink brought up grampton. Big mistake if you ask me. It's too big. It's just too big.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Leave a comment:
-
Im gutted the Grampton things been brought up here, I thought it was only Tom Pink and I knew about it
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: