If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I agree with Gut that there is a strong possibility that witness descriptions are not of the killer.
There are very few facts in my opinion. Maybe two:
1- The killer carried the weapon with him before and after the murders.
2- The victims were killed where they were found.
I do not include the throat cutting in facts, because it would mean taking the canonical five for granted, and that is more a deduction than fact.
Also, almost a fact, imo:
1- the killer was familiar with Whitechapel/Spitalfields.
So are you saying the witnesses saw no one with the victims, or that Annie Chapman found another customer within 30 minutes or so, Eddowes serviced the one she was seen with and found another within the same timeframe and near Mitre's Square who happened to be JTR? Was Stride beatened up by a suitor and then 10 minutes or so later JTR found her in Dutsfield's Yard and killed her?
I agree with Gut that there is a strong possibility that witness descriptions are not of the killer.
There are very few facts in my opinion. Maybe two:
1- The killer carried the weapon with him before and after the murders.
2- The victims were killed where they were found.
I do not include the throat cutting in facts, because it would mean taking the canonical five for granted, and that is more a deduction than fact.
Also, almost a fact, imo:
1- the killer was familiar with Whitechapel/Spitalfields.
Witness ID is of itself an interesting topic, in most jurisdictions if a criminal case involves ID evidence a judge is required to give the jury a warning as to how unreliable such evidence is.
I agree with Gut that there is a strong possibility that witness descriptions are not of the killer.
There are very few facts in my opinion. Maybe two:
1- The killer carried the weapon with him before and after the murders.
2- The victims were killed where they were found.
I do not include the throat cutting in facts, because it would mean taking the canonical five for granted, and that is more a deduction than fact.
Also, almost a fact, imo:
1- the killer was familiar with Whitechapel/Spitalfields.
About witness descriptions: there is an interesting TED talk from a forensic specialist. 20 minute long, worth watching.
Scott Fraser studies how humans remember crimes -- and bear witness to them. In this powerful talk, which focuses on a deadly shooting at sunset, he suggests that even close-up eyewitnesses to a crime can create "memories" they could not have seen. Why? Because the brain abhors a vacuum. Editor's note: In the original version of this talk, Scott Fraser misspoke about available footage of Two World Trade Center (Tower 2). The misstatement has been edited out for clarity.
Leave a comment: