Originally posted by Joshua Rogan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What makes Druitt a viable suspect?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Observer View Post
How on earth can you categorically prove that Mackenzie was a Ripper victim ! What a ridiculous statement
Theres nothing ridiculous about the statement. The point that was being made was that if the ripper killed Mackenzie, Coles and the Torso victims then Druitt can be discounted. My response was that unless it can be proven that Mackenzie, Coles and the Torso victims were killed by the ripper then that argument is invalid. Simple.
You should let personal stuff cloud your judgment.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post‘The police were searching for him alive, when he turned up dead.’[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]Last edited by Observer; 04-04-2019, 05:49 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Observer View Post
There is no evidence that he rented rooms in Whitechapel during the terror.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
I don’t think that this is the first time that you’ve jumped into a thread to try a ridicule a post of mine. There’s obviously something that rankles with you about me.
Theres nothing ridiculous about the statement. The point that was being made was that if the ripper killed Mackenzie, Coles and the Torso victims then Druitt can be discounted. My response was that unless it can be proven that Mackenzie, Coles and the Torso victims were killed by the ripper then that argument is invalid. Simple.
You should let personal stuff cloud your judgment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
I don’t think that this is the first time that you’ve jumped into a thread to try a ridicule a post of mine. There’s obviously something that rankles with you about me.
Theres nothing ridiculous about the statement. The point that was being made was that if the ripper killed Mackenzie, Coles and the Torso victims then Druitt can be discounted. My response was that unless it can be proven that Mackenzie, Coles and the Torso victims were killed by the ripper then that argument is invalid. Simple.
You should let personal stuff cloud your judgment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Wish thinking.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
No one is saying that he definitely did but it’s definitely a possibility, he definitely could have afforded to and there’s definately no evidence that he didn’t.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
Obviously he was trying to "cure" his homosexuality by picking up prostitutes... which didn't go too well.
Apologies for the macabre sense of humourLast edited by Observer; 04-04-2019, 06:55 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post
Yet elsewhere you have Hutchinson, your prime suspect, molesting a couple of school-boys down in Australia!?
And what of Feigenbaum's sexuality? He was getting on in years, yet left his estate to his sister. What ho, no wife nor kids? And in the merchant marines?
Or do these rather idle speculations only apply to MJD?
No offense intended, just sayin'
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by PaulB View Post
Just shooting the breeze for a moment, but if Druitt had been in Whitechapel and was heading for the railway station when he ran into Chapman in Hanbury Street, might he not have unthinkingly taken advantage of a fortuitous chance meeting? Perhaps it was purely by luck that he got back to Blackheath in time to play cricket.
Comment
Comment