Druitt.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

Anderson and Swanson clearly didn’t think it was unfounded. They were there. We weren’t.

I was not referring to Anderson and Swanson's remarks.

I was referring to a statement made on this forum that Kosminski 'was an insane and sexual maniac'.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

Im not quibbling. I’m stating a fact. There is no evidence for Druitt having an alibi. It can’t be simpler.

There is evidence that Druitt had an alibi, but we lack the information to assess how strong it was.

[Herlock Sholmes]

There is evidence that Druitt had an alibi, but we lack the information to assess how strong it was.

No there isn’t. I’m bored telling you this.

im not interested in responding to your imaginings PI.

No alibi……if you can’t prove one you can’t claim one. End of.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

No there isn’t. I’m bored telling you this.

im not interested in responding to your imaginings PI.

No alibi……if you can’t prove one you can’t claim one. End of.

It would have been for a court to decide whether his alibi was good enough or not.

You cannot decide that, especially as you have no idea what Druitt was doing in Dorset on the day of the murder.

[FISHY1118]

I notice that, as per the question in a previous thread Fishy, not one single person stood up to say that they would dismiss Druitt as a suspect before they dismissed one of the worst suspects imaginable….the joke that is Sir William Gull.

Druitt is a serious suspect mentioned by a very senior police officer. Gull is just the ripperological version of a comic interlude.

A sense of proportion would be nice.

But no one has said in their opinion he was jack the ripper either.

Please pay attention.

Druitt is definitely not a serious suspect.

[Herlock Sholmes]

But no one has said in their opinion he was jack the ripper either.

Please pay attention.

Druitt is definitely not a serious suspect.

You’ll have to excuse me if I don’t take the opinion of someone who favours one of the least likely suspects ever. A geriatric multi-stroke victim. And you have the nerve to call Druitt unlikely.

[Herlock Sholmes]

It would have been for a court to decide whether his alibi was good enough or not.

You cannot decide that, especially as you have no idea what Druitt was doing in Dorset on the day of the murder.

Bed time for me back on planet Earth.

[FISHY1118]

You’ll have to excuse me if I don’t take the opinion of someone who favours one of the least likely suspects ever. A geriatric multi-stroke victim. And you have the nerve to call Druitt unlikely.

Oh dear your doing it again .

Same rhetoric same old repeated lines

Druitt is very very unlikely .

Its been shown time and time again .

Let him go.

Or are you going to continue with this form of back and forth slurring that will no don't see another thread closed down . Againnnnnnnnn

[FISHY1118]

Bed time for me back on planet Earth.

Great response ,what a condescending approach you take to your replies , any wonder threads get tossed when this stuff is always posted .

[FISHY1118]

Of course.

You're not interested when someone else makes a completely unfounded accusation against a supposed suspect, but you quibble over what I say about whether Druitt can be proven not to have had an alibi.

Does this all the time PI you notice it too .

[Herlock Sholmes]

Oh dear your doing it again .

Same rhetoric same old repeated lines

Druitt is very very unlikely .

Its been shown time and time again .

Let him go.

Or are you going to continue with this form of back and forth slurring that will no don't see another thread closed down . Againnnnnnnnn

It appears that you’re repeating exactly the same tactic that you’ve blatantly tried on other threads Fishy. It’s hardly difficult to spot when you continue pretending to be a victim, using words like ‘slurs’ in an obvious ploy. There was clearly no slur. Only facts. Why don’t you talk about details Fishy?

Firstly, you call him “very, very unlikely,” which is simply a repetition of your own opinion. But you aren’t satisfied with that are you? You even call for him to be eliminated from the site (something that you’ve repeatedly done on other threads) which shows a complete intolerance of any opinion of others that you don’t agree with. Not only have you called for Druitt to be ‘eliminated’ you are repeatedly trying to do the same for me.

Stick the the discussion Fishy (or don’t bother) and ditch the tactics.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Great response ,what a condescending approach you take to your replies , any wonder threads get tossed when this stuff is always posted .

A second tactical attempt.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Does this all the time PI you notice it too .

And a third.

Its getting silly now Fishy. Please let go of this obvious vendetta and let’s stick to the evidence/details of the discussion at hand.

[FISHY1118]

It appears that you’re repeating exactly the same tactic that you’ve blatantly tried on other threads Fishy. It’s hardly difficult to spot when you continue pretending to be a victim, using words like ‘slurs’ in an obvious ploy. There was clearly no slur. Only facts. Why don’t you talk about details Fishy?

Firstly, you call him “very, very unlikely,” which is simply a repetition of your own opinion. But you aren’t satisfied with that are you? You even call for him to be eliminated from the site (something that you’ve repeatedly done on other threads) which shows a complete intolerance of any opinion of others that you don’t agree with. Not only have you called for Druitt to be ‘eliminated’ you are repeatedly trying to do the same for me.

Stick the the discussion Fishy (or don’t bother) and ditch the tactics.

Whine , whine, whine , im not interested in your comments , Druitt has been shown to be a weak suspect by a lot more posters than just me , like maybrick to much importance is placed on him as a jtr legitimate suspect.

You do this to yourself, thats obvious
.

[FISHY1118]

And a third.

Its getting silly now Fishy. Please let go of this obvious vendetta and let’s stick to the evidence/details of the discussion at hand.

I will if only you will .