Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reasons why?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post

    It was only because Kosminski was confined in an asylum and Druitt committed suicide that they became 'suspects'.
    .
    Why do you assume this to be the case in regard to Druitt? Macnaghten said that he'd received information which led him to consider Druitt a suspect. Yes we don't know what that information was but why should we assume that it never existed?

    As I've asked before - why, if he was simply looking for a name to add to his 'better than Cutbush' list, didn't he pick a more convincing suspect than Druitt? A man in Macnaghten's position would have had his pick from any number of dead criminals, lower class suicides, dead vagrants and incarcerated or dead lunatics. Any of which he could have named without risk of comebacks. Yet he chose an well-to-do Barrister who also worked at a posh school. A man who was related by marriage to one of his best friends. A man who, if someone looked into his life, might have been discovered to have had an alibi, for eg. a court appearance or some school or cricket-related business.

    Don't you find it strange to say the least that Mcnaghten, a part of the upper class establishment, would have randomly suggested someone like Druitt as the ripper knowing full well that he was entirely innocence?

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
    Do we know what Macnaghten meant when he said that Druitt was sexually insane? Might he have merely meant that Druitt was gay? Or did something else tht Victorians strongly disapproved of, but that today would not cause us to think that he was likely to kill and mutilate women?


    I am glad you asked those questions!

    I was thinking along similar lines the other day and when I looked up the definition of sexual insanity, I came across the following:

    'unhealthily obsessed with sexual activity'.​

    As far as we know, the nearest Druitt came to being obsessed with an activity was in the field of cricket.

    An important question is: what did Victorians, and in particular Macnaghten, understand by the term 'sexual insanity', bearing in mind that it appears that Kosminski's schizophrenia symptoms were believed by Macnaghten to have been caused by excessive masturbation.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    So would you say that all suspects should be dismissed or would you say that it’s possible that there might more to some suspects? Macnaghten clearly felt that there was reason for suspecting Druitt


    I would not dismiss suspects in the sense of wanting to end discussion.

    I am quite content to present my case in favour of their innocence.

    I do not believe that any person named as the murderer had any connection with the murders.

    Nor do I believe that it is possible to determine the identity of the murderer at this late stage.

    As you say, Macnaghten suspected Druitt, but then others point to the fact that Swanson suspected Kosminski and Abberline suspected Kłosowski.

    The questions I would ask are: why did Swanson not suspect Druitt? Why was Macnaghten inclined to exonerate Kosminski? Why did Abberline suspect neither Druitt nor Kosminski? Why was Anderson uninterested in the case against Druitt?

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

    I'm not as flexible with Kozminski, from everything I've read about him he appears to be an afterthought by Anderson, he selected him long after the murders which explains why there didn't appear to be a criminal file on the man.


    I used the same word - afterthought - in a post about a year ago, about both Kosminski and Druitt.

    It was only because Kosminski was confined in an asylum and Druitt committed suicide that they became 'suspects'.

    Indeed, Anderson originally had Kosminski in an asylum by the time the alleged identification took place, and Abberline actually stated that there was no other reason than his suicide for thinking that Druitt could have had anything to do with the murders.

    Leave a comment:


  • mpriestnall
    replied
    Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

    If we reject Macnaghten's belief that Druitt was JtR, then is there any reason for us to believe that Druitt had knowledge of JTR's and Astrakhan's identities?
    Please see my answer to P.I.

    I know my answer is not going to be that satisfying to anyone, but I don't find the reason for Druitt being JTR that saisfying either.

    Decades after Macnaghten, successive police chiefs (and G.R. Sims) claimed the "drowned barrister/teacher was JTR", yet without being able or willing to add one scintilla of extra information to their claims. Does that fact support or undermine their claims?

    Leave a comment:


  • mpriestnall
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post


    Don't tell me Astrakhan was a member of staff at Druitt's school!
    No, however I do believe the murders was undertaken by middle class men (JTR and Astrakhan) which opens the possibility of another member of the same class (Druitt) sharing a connection to the murderers, perhaps hearing rumours and putting two and two together. The murderers didn't operate in a vacuum and clues to identities and motives may have slipped out and Druitt, by the law of large numbers, just happen to be the (unlucky) one to whom sufficient identifying information came
    Last edited by mpriestnall; 12-10-2023, 09:02 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
    Do we know what Macnaghten meant when he said that Druitt was sexually insane? Might he have merely meant that Druitt was gay? Or did something else tht Victorians strongly disapproved of, but that today would not cause us to think that he was likely to kill and mutilate women?
    We've had long debates on that, opinions expressed in the late 19th century, as opposed to today, suggest he meant 'oversexed', if I recall correctly.
    The idea he was gay is modern, based primarily on the fact he taught at a boys school. But we also looked at the employees at the school and there were female cleaners & cookery staff listed, so it is not true to suggest he surrounded himself with boys. Separate schools for boys and girls was the norm for the middle class and above, in his day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post


    It is not a question of how often he consulted the files.

    The question is: why, when he was compiling a formal report, he appears not to have consulted the files at all.
    I think the whole question of whether or not Mac. did consult the files only has validity with Ostrog, who was a known criminal so Scotland Yard must have had a file on him.
    We cannot say the same about Kozminski & Druitt, though there may have been a medical file on Kozminski, but that would not be at Scotland Yard.


    If Anderson really knew the truth about Kosminski and it was as explosive as he made it out to be, then why would there not have been a file containing such information about him?
    I'm not as flexible with Kozminski, from everything I've read about him he appears to be an afterthought by Anderson, he selected him long after the murders which explains why there didn't appear to be a criminal file on the man.
    All Anderson had was a medical file, and his own theories. His dogmatic assertions about an incarcerated, insane Jew was sufficient for both Macnaghten & Swanson to not contradict their boss - in my opinion.


    And if he got his information from Anderson and if Swanson got his information from Anderson, then why does Swanson have Kosminski dying soon after the last murder was committed, whereas Macnaghten has him still being alive more than five years later?

    And if Swanson got his information from Anderson, then why did Anderson indicate to his publishers that Kosminski was still alive more than 20 years after the murders ended?
    Guessing why anyone gets anything wrong is always a challenge, especially when we have no official paperwork.
    Macnaghten agrees with Anderson in so far as Koz. is alive in 1894.
    Anderson seems to have been right as to Koz. being alive, Swanson got it wrong for some reason, or as he was making notes at least after 1910, he misremembered.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis C
    replied
    Originally posted by mpriestnall View Post
    My view on Druitt FWIW:

    1. Definitely NOT JTR.
    2. Murdered by a masonic cabal to keep him quiet about the knowledge he had of JTR's and Astrakhan's identities.

    I suspect this will not be a popular point of view.
    If we reject Macnaghten's belief that Druitt was JtR, then is there any reason for us to believe that Druitt had knowledge of JTR's and Astrakhan's identities?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis C
    replied
    Do we know what Macnaghten meant when he said that Druitt was sexually insane? Might he have merely meant that Druitt was gay? Or did something else tht Victorians strongly disapproved of, but that today would not cause us to think that he was likely to kill and mutilate women?

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    koz is mentioned by three senior police officers and druitt was tje favored suspect of one, and mentioned by a boatload of other contemps. other than abberlines suspect chapman, theyre the two best police suspects we have.

    you can dismiss them if you like, but it dosnt matter, because suspects they remain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post


    On the contrary, I have argued that there is no evidence against others, including Kosminski.
    So would you say that all suspects should be dismissed or would you say that it’s possible that there might more to some suspects? Macnaghten clearly felt that there was reason for suspecting Druitt

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    I’ve always found it strange that although we have no evidence to support any suspect, the phrase ‘but there’s no evidence’ is always thrown at Druitt as if he alone should be dismissed on those grounds.

    On the contrary, I have argued that there is no evidence against others, including Kosminski.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

    Too many 'Ripperologists' are eager to toss out the bathwater, not bothering to even wonder if there's a baby somewhere in the bubbles.
    I’ve always found it strange that although we have no evidence to support any suspect, the phrase ‘but there’s no evidence’ is always thrown at Druitt as if he alone should be dismissed on those grounds. We always see an enthusiasm to dismiss him and to assume that MacNaghten was a liar (without evidence for it). As you say “throwing the baby out with the bath water” without considering what might have gone unrecorded (or what might have been recorded but was now missing.)

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by mpriestnall View Post
    My view on Druitt FWIW:

    1. Definitely NOT JTR.
    2. Murdered by a masonic cabal to keep him quiet about the knowledge he had of JTR's and Astrakhan's identities.

    I suspect this will not be a popular point of view.

    Don't tell me Astrakhan was a member of staff at Druitt's school!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X