Originally posted by Trevor Marriott
View Post
She was described as wearing a scarf before she was murdered, but it was not mentioned as among her clothing at the mortuary. So, possibly he took the scarf to wrap the uterus in.
We do not know if any of the other victims were missing any clothing.
On another point if what you say, if the taking of the organs was that premeditated as you suggest would you not have thought that the killer would have taken something with him to take away the organs in?
Even, if in some cases where he is described as carrying a bag, the bag would be messed up inside if he just placed an unwrapped organ in the bag. So, he would wrap it in something anyway.
But may I remind you again that the description of the apron piece is not consistent with freshly cut organs taken out of a human body and wrapped in it...
On that note I have noticed that when discussing this topic and the topic of Druitt not one of the senior officers referred to makes any mention of the killer taking organs,....
Now I find that strange bearing in mind something of this nature in a series of murders would have been most unusual and I would have expected it to have been documented by one of them. So I have to wonder why? did they know that the killer did not take them but for obvious reasons kept if from the general public because I would suggest that if it hade been made public that organs were being taken for financial gain from mortuaries I would suspect that the press would have had a field day.
Comment