Hi Fiver,
It's possible, of course. My disbelief in it is just that, a personal disbelief. I think the gates probably would open inwards, but then, it seems most probable to me that the gates would be open fully, leaving very little room for someone to get in the space behind. Obviously I don't know the actual position of the gate, so it's entirely possible there was room, but that seems to me to have a much lower probability. Others may have a different impression on how likely that is, which would lead to a different option. But none of us know the details, so we're left comparing opinions. And I suppose he could sneak to the waterclosets, but that's a long way to travel. At what point does hearing a pony and cart coming down the street signal "flee"? JtR is not to know that Deimshutz was going to enter the yard. As far as JtR knew, the pony was just going to continue down the street. He doesn't appear to have fled when someone was next door in the Chapman case, so would he really flee all the way across the yard at the sound of traffic in the street? I don't know, it doesn't quite fit together well for me. Leaving the scene well before Deimshutz's arrival, though, perhaps when Goldstein walked by, and Fanny Mortimer closed her door, that was just too much activity in the area, and he left at that point (that's only a few minutes, 4 by one of FM's newspaper accounts as I recall, before Deimshutz turns up on the scene).
Anyway, I can't say he definitely wasn't hiding in the yard as there is no proof one way or the other, but my own sense of the probability of him hiding in the yard is sufficiently low that I don't believe he was. That's not worth much, though, and if something were to be uncovered to provide new information, then my sense of the probabilities would change, either strengthening my disbelief, or weakening it, maybe even to the point of believing it.
It's probably just my idiosyncratic way of phrasing things, but I tend to refer to belief or disbelief in something when I think it is probable or improbable, rather than when it is proven or disproven. For the latter, I omit reference to my belief, and just state "It's like this ...." or "It wasn't that ...". I don't have the opportunity to do those very often in JtR related discussions though.
- Jeff
Originally posted by Fiver
View Post
Anyway, I can't say he definitely wasn't hiding in the yard as there is no proof one way or the other, but my own sense of the probability of him hiding in the yard is sufficiently low that I don't believe he was. That's not worth much, though, and if something were to be uncovered to provide new information, then my sense of the probabilities would change, either strengthening my disbelief, or weakening it, maybe even to the point of believing it.
It's probably just my idiosyncratic way of phrasing things, but I tend to refer to belief or disbelief in something when I think it is probable or improbable, rather than when it is proven or disproven. For the latter, I omit reference to my belief, and just state "It's like this ...." or "It wasn't that ...". I don't have the opportunity to do those very often in JtR related discussions though.
- Jeff
Comment