Barring a William Stewart-esque "Potty Time" reconstruction, it's hard to see how a "fake" Dutfield's Yard could be mocked up, and harder still to see what stood to be gained from such an enterprise. It's not as if it would subvert anything to the extent than an artefact purporting to belong to the killer would, or prompt a rewriting of history such as would a letter that laid claim to have been the first of its kind.
I can't for the life of me imagine why anyone should even entertain the idea that a photo of some manky East End yard should be a viable target for fakery - especially if it were taken after the event, and is (presumably) bereft of a corpse.
I can't for the life of me imagine why anyone should even entertain the idea that a photo of some manky East End yard should be a viable target for fakery - especially if it were taken after the event, and is (presumably) bereft of a corpse.
Comment