Originally posted by Pcdunn
View Post
I recall another witness placed the start of his story at 2:00am, and someone on here said 2:00 was used in a story about the victim in a weekend paper, and they argued that "he must have got the time from that article".
The same witness was then accused of using a description "well-dressed man" in his story because the same phrase appeared in another story over that same weekend.
I'm not following the logic here.
Do witness statement have to be lies because the same adjective, phrase or surname appears in print a few days prior to the witness being interviewed?
Aren't these same words in use every day by everyone?
Comment