Coincidence?

[moste]

I am well aware that a newspaper article claimed that a witness claimed that Eddowes claimed to know who the killer was. That same edition of the paper mentioned four other people who were also sure they knew who the Ripper was. If Eddowes did actually say that, she was one of dozens of people who claimed to know who the Ripper was. If the Ripper was killing everyone who claimed to know who he was, there would have been dozens more victims and a lot wider range of victim types.

Not necessarily , Eddowes may be the only one who the Ripper knew knew him.

[Al Bundy's Eyes]

Famiylsearch does not require anyone to become a member of a church. It is free for anyone to use.

It's a Mormon site. That must make family trees interesting.

[Fiver]

Afraid not
Every part of London you can think of .
I couldn't create an account on your link as it wanted me to be a member of a church but here's a link and a site that everyone can use ....

https://www.findmypast.co.uk/search/...don%2c+england

Famiylsearch does not require anyone to become a member of a church. It is free for anyone to use.

[Sam Flynn]

Semantics Sam.

It's not semantics... it's two entirely different addresses and the bloody twenty is missing from both! The only thing that's common to the two (different) names is bloody Kelly, and she'd been dating/cohabiting with a Mr Kelly for SEVEN YEARS.

For God's sake!!!

[Michael W Richards]

That's not the point. Every single resident and visitor to Miller's Court referred to it as such, and there was even a cast-iron sign over the archway that advertised it as "Miller's Court".

6 - yes, six - Dorset was at the other end of the street... and 6 Fashion St - let's not forget - was a couple of minutes' walk away on the opposite side of Commercial Street.

Semantics Sam. As I said, 22 of 23 characters in the 2 aliases Kate used in her last 24 hours before she is murdered...can be constructed to create almost all of Mary Jane Kellys complete name and address. The next victim, assumed to be in sequence in a series. Its the cumulative, not just the isolated details that are suggestive that she at the very least knew Mary Jane Kelly in Dorset Street.

[Sam Flynn]

Let me ask you...if mail had been sent to Mary Kelly c/o 26 Dorset, would she have received it?

That's not the point. Every single resident and visitor to Miller's Court referred to it as such, and there was even a cast-iron sign over the archway that advertised it as "Miller's Court".

6 - yes, six - Dorset was at the other end of the street... and 6 Fashion St - let's not forget - was a couple of minutes' walk away on the opposite side of Commercial Street.

[Al Bundy's Eyes]

...what about Fashion Street, where the actual fictitious "Mary" lived? The one who lived in Dorset Street was simply "Jane".

We can be as selective or creative as we like, the fact of the matter is that we have to munge together two fake names/addresses - one given to the police, and the other to a pawnbroker, for God's sake - and ignore or add details to make "Mary Jane Kelly" of "26 Dorset Street"... and ignore the fact that she lived in 13 Miller's Court.

Munge? What a cromulent term!

[Michael W Richards]

...what about Fashion Street, where the actual fictitious "Mary" lived? The one who lived in Dorset Street was simply "Jane".

We can be as selective or creative as we like, the fact of the matter is that we have to munge together two fake names/addresses - one given to the police, and the other to a pawnbroker, for God's sake - and ignore or add details to make "Mary Jane Kelly" of "26 Dorset Street"... and ignore the fact that she lived in 13 Miller's Court.

Let me ask you...if mail had been sent to Mary Kelly c/o 26 Dorset, would she have received it? Millers Court was accessed from the rear of #26 Dorset or the tunnel, Marys room in the rear of #26 was that access point from that house to that court. Either address would reveal her. Her room in every sense, structurally or otherwise, belonged to the house, not the court.

[Sam Flynn]

The mere fact that 6 Dorset Street is mentioned in connection with a "Jane Kelly" is an eyebrow raiser, the fact that she is next "Mary Ann Kelly" is also. No matter how many Mary Kellys you find in the census its a moot point...there was only 1 that we know of in Dorset Street.

...what about Fashion Street, where the actual fictitious "Mary" lived? The one who lived in Dorset Street was simply "Jane".

We can be as selective or creative as we like, the fact of the matter is that we have to munge together two fake names/addresses - one given to the police, and the other to a pawnbroker, for God's sake - and ignore or add details to make "Mary Jane Kelly" of "26 Dorset Street"... and ignore the fact that she lived in 13 Miller's Court.

[Michael W Richards]

Because it is hearsay?

What isn't hearsay in these cases Jon? All we can hope for is corroboration, and I agree, aside from the superintendent of the casual ward in Shoe Lane it seems she mentioned this to no one else... that came forward. They are in desperate straights, she said they barely had money to get back to London, and with the boots gone they are running out of clothing to hock. I think this was her plan to deal with that, they had nothing tangible to sell but she thought she had information people would pay for. Be it Police or whomever. I think the reason John doesn't go looking for Kate right away is because he knew what she was planning, and wanted no part of the dangerous folks involved. Ive perused the press again on this murder and I don't see Kelly or anyone else refer to a loving relation between him and Kate, a pleasant one without disagreements seems to have been the case. I believe they acted as a team, not man and wife, and therefore Kate would not be inclined to represent herself as Kelly to anyone based on her relationship with John. If people assumed it, so be it, but I don't read any pseudo marital vibe in the comments.

[Michael W Richards]

The mere fact that 6 Dorset Street is mentioned in connection with a "Jane Kelly" is an eyebrow raiser, the fact that she is next "Mary Ann Kelly" is also. No matter how many Mary Kellys you find in the census its a moot point...there was only 1 that we know of in Dorset Street.

[packers stem]

And I have produced evidence that the 1891 Census of England and Wales shows there were over 900 women living in London named Mary Kelly and who who were born between 1840 and 1870. I linked to a geneology site, which anyone is free to check, while you provided a screenshot. I suspect the discrepancy is due to your source only counting people within a mile (or perhaps less) radius of the center of the City of London.

Afraid not
Every part of London you can think of .
I couldn't create an account on your link as it wanted me to be a member of a church but here's a link and a site that everyone can use ....

https://www.findmypast.co.uk/search/...don%2c+england

[Al Bundy's Eyes]

I am well aware that a newspaper article claimed that a witness claimed that Eddowes claimed to know who the killer was. That same edition of the paper mentioned four other people who were also sure they knew who the Ripper was. If Eddowes did actually say that, she was one of dozens of people who claimed to know who the Ripper was. If the Ripper was killing everyone who claimed to know who he was, there would have been dozens more victims and a lot wider range of victim types.

Why is this mystery witness quoted in the paper taken as gospel? We analyse and critique every word said by everyone else, but someone says Kate knew who the killer was and it's taken as fact? And then we construct an entire senario from it where Kate decides to embark on what must be the daftest blackmail scam ever devised.
Of course, if the witness was wrong, lying, mistaken the whole scam falls on its arse, tied to the fact that it also depends on the killer being wealthy.

[Fiver]

Why are you and everyone forgetting that a witness says Kate claimed to know a killer? That's enough to get her killed by that same killer. Simple math...that seems elusive to some people for some reason.

I am well aware that a newspaper article claimed that a witness claimed that Eddowes claimed to know who the killer was. That same edition of the paper mentioned four other people who were also sure they knew who the Ripper was. If Eddowes did actually say that, she was one of dozens of people who claimed to know who the Ripper was. If the Ripper was killing everyone who claimed to know who he was, there would have been dozens more victims and a lot wider range of victim types.

[Fiver]

So ,i've produced evidence that there were around 125 Mary Kelly's in the entirety of London , in the 1891 census born between 1850 and 1870..... which anybody is free to check.

And I have produced evidence that the 1891 Census of England and Wales shows there were over 900 women living in London named Mary Kelly and who who were born between 1840 and 1870. I linked to a geneology site, which anyone is free to check, while you provided a screenshot. I suspect the discrepancy is due to your source only counting people within a mile (or perhaps less) radius of the center of the City of London.