If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hello Greg. Right you are about these 2 ladies. And here's a thought experiment. What would have happened had both McKenzie and Coles died in early December and on the same night? How would the public and the Met have reacted?
Indeed Lynn. Pandemonium and canonization I'd expect. But remember, time heals all wounds...........Whoops, sorry, bad pun.....
Hello Greg. Right you are about these 2 ladies. And here's a thought experiment. What would have happened had both McKenzie and Coles died in early December and on the same night? How would the public and the Met have reacted?
You click on the 'quote' box which is at at the bottom of each post and the post appears in full in the reply box and you reply the same as with an email. You can delete the bits in the quote you don't want but you have to take care not to delete the square (ie [ and ]) quote brackets.
Brilliant. The digitally challenged learn something new every day. Thanks Stephen.
By the way, can someone tell me how to get the Originally Posted by bit when I copy and quote something......
You click on the 'quote' box which is at at the bottom of each post and the post appears in full in the reply box and you reply the same as with an email. You can delete the bits in the quote you don't want but you have to take care not to delete the square (ie [ and ]) quote brackets.
Rape is a quick word - one syllable.
The usage of 'Stop thief' is similar to my scenario of being chased around a room. If chased or given time to think the I think a 'murder' cry is likely or possible - or if someone is beating up his wife, but not actually murdering her. Not however, I think, immediately before a blitz slashing attack.
Well, if you wake up and someone is standing over you with a knife, "murder" would seem to be the appropriate response.
1. If JTR existed, then he killed at least 5 women in 1888. premise
2. JTR existed. premise
Conclusion: JTR killed at least 5 women in 1888. 1 & 2 modus ponens
Valid argument? Of course! Stands to reason? Indeed. Convincing regarding its conclusion? No.
Cheers.
LC
i dont understand this either..... yes JTR existed and yes it's very easy to start killing at this time and to blame JTR instead, to mask your crimes.
now did this happen ?..... not sure, but dont rule it out, i would be very careful here, because i've been around for ages and many people i know aren't sure about this either.... especially the torsos.
Sutcliffe did not kill all the women that the press said he did, someone else did as well, so take care here.
Hello Ruby. Well, no question at all. Merely a demonstration that, given a predilection for petitio principii, one can "prove" anything (ie, stands to reason).
Your reply was lofty and superior, and not in plain English, nevertheless
I still like you (!) so I will say that my 'assumptions' are based on the statistics for murder in the given time and location and make perfect sense.
In stating that the Canonical victims, and Martha Tabram, and probably others, were all victims of the Serial Killer known as 'Jack The Ripper', I don't think that I'm putting forward anything contentious.
Hello Ruby. Well, no question at all. Merely a demonstration that, given a predilection for petitio principii, one can "prove" anything (ie, stands to reason).
Leave a comment: