Take the taste test.
Hello Dave. Thanks.
"She's clearly a lady of very poor taste"
You've tasted her, then? (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
What 5 Questions Would You Like Answered?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Dave. Thanks.
"it has to be said, that. . . Lynn is above all else a gentleman!"
And that is why my wife is divorcing me. (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
Every good wish
Dave
Leave a comment:
-
Nautical bias
"What would 'hard labor' for a woman have been?"
Likely oakum picking.
All the best
Dave
Leave a comment:
-
gentleman
Hello Dave. Thanks.
"it has to be said, that. . . Lynn is above all else a gentleman!"
And that is why my wife is divorcing me. (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
feeling rejected
Hello Trevor. Thanks.
"Trying to get Lynn Cates to tell us what his line of thinking is."
Does this mean I am rejected by the "conspiracy theorists" as well as the "cartel"?
Oh dear, what is a poor centrist to do? (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
oakum
Hello CFL.
"What would 'hard labor' for a woman have been?"
Likely oakum picking.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
caution
Hello (again) Trevor. If one got a D & D and a caution for solicitation, would that solicitation be noted at court?
"Police should carefully avoid being drawn into conversation with any prostitute, for unfounded charges and suspicions may easily arise therefrom."
Or a tryst. Ask Ed Watkins.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
warning
Hello Trevor. Thanks.
Something like a warning, then?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Yes you are right a record is kept of the caution. But it is not recorded as a criminal conviction.
IN Victorian times a caution for soliciting as likely as not would simply be recorded in a register.
If she were arrested for D & D then the caution for soliciting if she ever had one would not be relevant to the disposal of that offence.
If she had already been cautioned then the next time as per victorian laws she would likely as not been sent to prison
From the Police Codes
Vagrancy Act, 1824 every common prostitute wandering in the public streets or public highways, or in any place of public resort, and behaving in a riotous or indecent manner, is deemed an idle and disorderly person, and liable to one month's imprisonment with hard labour.
Metropolitan Police Act, 1839, every common prostitute, or night-walker, loitering, or being in any thoroughfare, or public place, for the purpose of prostitution or solicitation, to the annoyance of the inhabitants or passengers, is liable to a penalty of 40s.
Town Police Clauses Act, 1847, every common prostitute or night-walker loitering and importuning passengers, for the purpose of prostitution, is subject to a similar fine, or fourteen days' imprisonment in default.
Police should carefully avoid being drawn into conversation with any prostitute, for unfounded charges and suspicions may easily arise therefrom. At the same time they should avoid bullying or unduly harassing these unfortunate persons if their conduct is orderly, and be acquainted with the address and way to any houses or shelters of refuge for them.
All the best
Dave
Leave a comment:
-
I laughed out loud at the aptness in this particular case Trevor, but it has to be said, that unlike either you or I, Lynn is above all else a gentleman!
All the best
Dave
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by C. F. Leon View PostWhat would 'hard labor' for a woman have been?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cogidubnus View PostHeal Shelden quotes the 13th November 1884 case in his "Victims" book and says Liz got seven days hard labour
Cheers
Dave
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cogidubnus View PostHi Trevor
Yes but this is described as an actual conviction at The Thames Magistrates Court (Thames Police Court?) on 13th November 1884...I know she'd been widowed only the month before, but her husband had clearly been in ill health for a long while before, and if she'd consequently had to resort to soliciting, it's quite possible surely that she'd already had the LVP equivalent of a caution?
Just a thought
Dave
PS - but accepting a caution does actually start off a formal criminal record does it not?
IN Victorian times a caution for soliciting as likely as not would simply be recorded in a register.
If she were arrested for D & D then the caution for soliciting if she ever had one would not be relevant to the disposal of that offence.
If she had already been cautioned then the next time as per victorian laws she would likely as not been sent to prison
From the Police Codes
Vagrancy Act, 1824 every common prostitute wandering in the public streets or public highways, or in any place of public resort, and behaving in a riotous or indecent manner, is deemed an idle and disorderly person, and liable to one month's imprisonment with hard labour.
Metropolitan Police Act, 1839, every common prostitute, or night-walker, loitering, or being in any thoroughfare, or public place, for the purpose of prostitution or solicitation, to the annoyance of the inhabitants or passengers, is liable to a penalty of 40s.
Town Police Clauses Act, 1847, every common prostitute or night-walker loitering and importuning passengers, for the purpose of prostitution, is subject to a similar fine, or fourteen days' imprisonment in default.
Police should carefully avoid being drawn into conversation with any prostitute, for unfounded charges and suspicions may easily arise therefrom. At the same time they should avoid bullying or unduly harassing these unfortunate persons if their conduct is orderly, and be acquainted with the address and way to any houses or shelters of refuge for them.Last edited by Trevor Marriott; 07-05-2013, 10:24 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: