all the murders took place at beginning of month, or end of month including millwood and tabram. the only odd one out (in my c7) is mckenzie who was killed in the middle of the month. but she was the last and killed much later compared to the other murders so perhaps his work pattern had changed?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Patterns and Co-incidences
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by caz View Post
More of a remarkable coincidence for me is that the killer struck again within a few days of the Dear Boss letter being written and sent, threatening to get to work again right away, but before it was made public. If there had been no more murders after Hanbury Street, that letter would have been the dampest of damp squibs. But the murders didn't stop, and the timing was perfect. The author was even rewarded with an explosive double event on the very next occasion, resulting in the letter and the Saucy Jacky postcard spawning hundreds of mostly pale imitations and the 'trade name' taking on a life of its own.
It's almost as if the killer knew about the promise made on his behalf, and the author knew the killer would not let him down.
Love,
Caz
X
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postall the murders took place at beginning of month, or end of month including millwood and tabram. the only odd one out (in my c7) is mckenzie who was killed in the middle of the month. but she was the last and killed much later compared to the other murders so perhaps his work pattern had changed?
Comment
-
While we are discussing coincidences, I guess the most well known and argued about is the GSG. The apron piece was coincidently left near a piece of graffiti that was ambiguous enough that some think it refers to the JtR murders. Or perhaps it actually does.
Comment
-
Originally posted by etenguy View PostWhile we are discussing coincidences, I guess the most well known and argued about is the GSG. The apron piece was coincidently left near a piece of graffiti that was ambiguous enough that some think it refers to the JtR murders. Or perhaps it actually does."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by etenguy View Post
Indeed, Caz. And if we believe that the Dear Boss and Saucy Jack communications were not written by the murderer - there is the also the coincidence in relation to Eddowes ear lobe being cut off. As you say it almost makes you believe that the killer knew what was in those communications whether or not he was the author (so someone who knew the writer or someone who had access either from the police or the central news bureau). Or it was just a coincidence.
From the killer's point of view, if he authored the Dear Boss letter [or knew about it], there would have been an added incentive to repeat on his last job, in Hanbury Street, as soon as possible, to give Central News the scoop he had promised. That would have made him even keener to find a second victim if he wasn't able to live up to his trade name in Dutfield's Yard, because of all the comings and goings there. Imagine his humiliation if the letter was published the next day and he'd only managed to slit his next victim's throat.
It may have been a coincidence, but if we allow for the alternative, we have a pretty clear example here of cause and effect.
Same with the apron and the GSG. A serial killer will always try to blame someone or something else for his own failings. So I tend to see the message as Abby does, underlined by the apron piece, to blame local Jews for his need to kill a second woman that night, so he could mutilate this one and fulfil the Dear Boss prediction. "See what they made me do."
And so it came to pass, with the confirmation arriving by way of the postcard postscript.
Love,
Caz
XLast edited by caz; 05-20-2021, 01:59 PM."Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
Comment
-
Originally posted by caz View Post
Hi etenguy,
From the killer's point of view, if he authored the Dear Boss letter [or knew about it], there would have been an added incentive to repeat on his last job, in Hanbury Street, as soon as possible, to give Central News the scoop he had promised. That would have made him even keener to find a second victim if he wasn't able to live up to his trade name in Dutfield's Yard, because of all the comings and goings there. Imagine his humiliation if the letter was published the next day and he'd only managed to slit his next victim's throat.
It may have been a coincidence, but if we allow for the alternative, we have a pretty clear example here of cause and effect.
Same with the apron and the GSG. A serial killer will always try to blame someone or something else for his own failings. So I tend to see the message as Abby does, underlined by the apron piece, to blame local Jews for his need to kill a second woman that night, so he could mutilate this one and fulfil the Dear Boss prediction. "See what they made me do."
And so it came to pass, with the confirmation arriving by way of the postcard postscript.
Love,
Caz
X
.to blame local Jews for his need to kill a second woman that night, so he could mutilate this one and fulfil the Dear Boss prediction."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Cheers Abby.
The psychology is spot on too, isn't it? Stride 'squealed a bit', as if the killer saw her as a sow, an animal to be hunted. If a hoaxer wrote this, they had a good handle on the situation, and instantly recognised the phenomenon of the double event. It would be decades before the rest of us caught up, due to known repeat offenders, including Ted Bundy, doing a Dutfield's Yard to Mitre Square of their own.
Love,
Caz
X
"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by caz View PostCheers Abby.
The psychology is spot on too, isn't it? Stride 'squealed a bit', as if the killer saw her as a sow, an animal to be hunted. If a hoaxer wrote this, they had a good handle on the situation, and instantly recognised the phenomenon of the double event. It would be decades before the rest of us caught up, due to known repeat offenders, including Ted Bundy, doing a Dutfield's Yard to Mitre Square of their own.
Love,
Caz
X"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by caz View Post
From the killer's point of view, if he authored the Dear Boss letter [or knew about it], there would have been an added incentive to repeat on his last job, in Hanbury Street, as soon as possible, to give Central News the scoop he had promised. That would have made him even keener to find a second victim if he wasn't able to live up to his trade name in Dutfield's Yard, because of all the comings and goings there. Imagine his humiliation if the letter was published the next day and he'd only managed to slit his next victim's throat.
It may have been a coincidence, but if we allow for the alternative, we have a pretty clear example here of cause and effect.
Same with the apron and the GSG. A serial killer will always try to blame someone or something else for his own failings. So I tend to see the message as Abby does, underlined by the apron piece, to blame local Jews for his need to kill a second woman that night, so he could mutilate this one and fulfil the Dear Boss prediction.
"See what they made me do."
The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing
"See what they made me do", would require something like this ...
The Juwes are the men that are not blamed for nothing
The real GSG is a prediction, not a statement of cause and effect.
And so it came to pass, with the confirmation arriving by way of the postcard postscript.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Originally posted by etenguy View Post
....... And if we believe that the Dear Boss and Saucy Jack communications were not written by the murderer - there is the also the coincidence in relation to Eddowes ear lobe being cut off. As you say it almost makes you believe that the killer knew what was in those communications whether or not he was the author (so someone who knew the writer or someone who had access either from the police or the central news bureau). Or it was just a coincidence.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
yes. and who but the killer would know about stride "squealed a bit" as in yelled out but not too loudly as a witness claimed? thats three things the writer of dear boss/saucy jack got right-starting again soon, cutting the ear off, and a victim squealing a bit.
yet when I picked her up and pulled her into the yard and forced her onto the ground, she was as quiet as a mouse!Last edited by NotBlamedForNothing; 05-21-2021, 03:12 PM.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Originally posted by caz View PostCheers Abby.
The psychology is spot on too, isn't it? Stride 'squealed a bit', as if the killer saw her as a sow, an animal to be hunted.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Comment