E Petitions and Ripper Files and papers

[Sister Hyde]

That doesn't surprise me Cam.

Monty

well at least you're lucid.....^^....for a while....

[Monty]

well now for some reasons thios is making me wet my pants

That doesn't surprise me Cam.

Monty

[Sister Hyde]

I have my own mind and do not wish your propoganda crap in my mail. Naïve others may hang off your every word, I do not.

Monty

well now for some reasons thios is making me wet my pants

[Monty]

Beat others into submission?

I see no one else ranting here, in bold, other than you Trevor.

If Cam and Mike want to either leave or follow your cause then I wish them luck. Their choice, as was mine when I asked Stephen not to mail your bollocks on to me.

I have my own mind and do not wish your propoganda crap in my mail. Naïve others may hang off your every word, I do not.

Monty

[Sister Hyde]

wait!!! I didn't tell maria what's on my heart yet and it's been tickling me for months: DON'T SAY MOTHER****ER MOTHER****ER!!!!!!!!!!!! hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm that felt gooooooooooood!

[Trevor Marriott]

Sis,

The idea of a common goal is a good one, but experience tells me that at least one party in this argument says "common" but means "me." I wish it weren't so, and maybe I'm wrong. I'll give you a hint: It isn't me and it isn't Jesus.


Mike

Well it is isnt "me" thats for sure I didnt initiate the petitions. As stated two very interested ripper entusiasts did it, but once again its an ideal opportunity for some to have a go at me yet again, but hey ho water off a ducks back to me.

Those who have beat others into submission will not do so with me. I see another valuable member in Sister Hyde has had enough and left how many more will leave as a result of the actions of a mindless few on here.

But of course they will still have JTR forums where they can still keep stirring the poison pot

[Sister Hyde]

Sis,

The idea of a common goal is a good one, but experience tells me that at least one party in this argument says "common" but means "me." I wish it weren't so, and maybe I'm wrong. I'll give you a hint: It isn't me and it isn't Jesus.


Mike

Then Michael Dear you will understand my desertion. it does make me pissed cause there are few people like you i'll be missing from the board, they know who they are, but now, it's more than enough, i want ripperology to remain something I enjoy, not something I end up feeling sick from like it happened with the extreme metal scene. so i'm out.

so long!

[Trevor Marriott]

Don,

Superficially, the idea of de-classification sounds like a good one. I haven't looked at the petition, nor have I seen Stewart and Paul's arguments against it. Is it possible to brief me on this?

Typically, I am against government control over old documents on the basis of historical value, even if release of such creates unpleasantness for some people, myself included. If there are compelling reasons not to have these items released, I would like to hear them.

Mike

The complellng reasons do not stand up to close scrutiny both from Messrs Begg and Evans nor from The Police themsleves.

[The Good Michael]

Sis,

The idea of a common goal is a good one, but experience tells me that at least one party in this argument says "common" but means "me." I wish it weren't so, and maybe I'm wrong. I'll give you a hint: It isn't me and it isn't Jesus.


Mike

[Trevor Marriott]

First of all, I quite agree with Neil that for more of Marriott's nonsense to be sent to all Casebook members (he previously PMed everyone -- supposedly with permission -- with an ad for his book) would be an unwarranted and unwelcome intrusion.

Moreover, the petition is stuff and nonsense and basically a publicity stunt.

Further, both Stewart Evans and Paul Begg were in agreement and provided quite cogent and compelling reasons why the petitition drive ought be quickly forgotten.

Finally, the UK-only petition contains a howling grammatical error.

Don.

You are so narrow minded

And where did I mention any book Mr Know it all ?

So the gods have spoken so we all ought sit up and take notice, get real.

They failed thats no slur on them. However I failed in some respects but all was not in vain so only a partial failure not a total one

[Sister Hyde]

Ok, this is the last ******* straw!!!!!!!!!!!!!! since no one here can help themselves to be so goddamned dumb and stubborn and since no one can learn to work together despite differences to help to a same goal, this is seriously making me feel to take out my crowbar and smash some inbred skulls, I won't feel any regret there for slamming the bloody door!!!!!!!! I might be the unbearable psycho bitch but i can seriously say my image of so called "serious researchers" has been very damaged here, ENOUGH MATERIAL ON THESE BOARDS TO GET YOU DISGUSTED OF YOUR FAVORITE HOBBY. seriously this won't prevent me from sleeping at night!!! CAAAAM AWAAAAAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[The Good Michael]

Don,

Superficially, the idea of de-classification sounds like a good one. I haven't looked at the petition, nor have I seen Stewart and Paul's arguments against it. Is it possible to brief me on this?

Typically, I am against government control over old documents on the basis of historical value, even if release of such creates unpleasantness for some people, myself included. If there are compelling reasons not to have these items released, I would like to hear them.

Mike

[Supe]

First of all, I quite agree with Neil that for more of Marriott's nonsense to be sent to all Casebook members (he previously PMed everyone -- supposedly with permission -- with an ad for his book) would be an unwarranted and unwelcome intrusion.

Moreover, the petition is stuff and nonsense and basically a publicity stunt.

Further, both Stewart Evans and Paul Begg were in agreement and provided quite cogent and compelling reasons why the petitition drive ought be quickly forgotten.

Finally, the UK-only petition contains a howling grammatical error.

Don.

[Monty]

Firstly Trevor, my remark was addressed to Stephen Ryder and not you.

Secondly, I care not for your contempt.

Thirdly, I am a member of this site out of choice. I chose to be a member to learn and partake in debate. Not to have causes thrown down my throat and enforced into my Email in box.

Fourthly, to ask an unbiaised site such as this to mail its membership regarding an E petition is beyond galling.

Fifthly, if said unbaised site does indeed carry out your outrageous request the I shall consider my own membership. However my trust and belief in this site is such that I am extremely confident such a consideration will not happen.

Finally, same as firstly really. My request is none of your business. I shall make it when I choose, to whom I choose, why I choose and how I choose.

Your hypocrisy screams.

Monty

[Trevor Marriott]

Stephen,

Please dont bother mailing the details to me.

I'm sure we both have better things to do with our time.

Cheers
Monty

I will treat that remark with the contempt both you and the remark demands